My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07875
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07875
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:29:17 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:39:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.116.I
Description
Fruitland Mesa Project
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
1/1/1976
Title
Comments re: Draft Environmental Statement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />MONTllOSE COUNTY <br />, P.O. Hox 1289 <br />Montrose, Colormlo 8HOl <br /> <br />f <br />\- <br />i <br /> <br />COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br />Denms W, Morris. Dlslflet 1 <br />Joh" A. KrJmer, Jr. D/stflet 2 <br />Eart G. Robuck.. D/sf",r 3 <br /> <br />October 8, 1976 <br /> <br />Office of the Eegional Director <br />Bureau of Reclamation <br />Federal Building <br />125 South State Street <br />Salt'Lake City, Utah 84147 <br /> <br />'- <br /> <br />Be: Fruitland Mesa pcoject <br />Praft Environmental Impact Statement <br /> <br />The Board of County Commissioners of Montrose County have <br />reviewed the draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Fruit- <br />land Mesa Project. <br /> <br />j <br />1 <br />, <br /> <br />In reviewing the Environmental Impact Statement, no consid- <br />eration has been given to the limited maintenance of the Crystal <br />Creek Road, J-82, approximately 2imiles of which is in Montrose <br />County. According to the statement, the west portal of the tunnel <br />will be approximately'f'our miles beyond "ny point preViously inain:,', <br />tained by the county. The Commissioners feel that year-round main~ <br />tenance should be part of the Fruitland Mesa Project and the respons- . <br />ibility of the contraetor during ccnstruction. The County has adopted <br />a resolution that the County will not maintain roads ror snow removal <br />on limited traveled roads durillgthe winter months. The right-or-way <br />.on the existing road is very minimal. In previous years, the county <br />has ~ad problems with snow removal; pushing. down private land owner's <br />. fences ,and the commissiollers feel the right-or way should be part or <br />.the Fruitland Mesa Project, to widen and improve this road for the safe <br />and adequate transportation of equipment that will'be used to excavate <br />the tunnel. <br /> <br />The county' has also adopted resolutions requiring that .any new <br />roads builtin newly subdivided areas. will be the. 'rcspollsibility of <br />the subdivider 01' the people improving the land. . Therefore,' the <br />Commissioners feel any new ro"ds which must be built to serve any new, <br />homes or services in the newly developed land should be a part o'f the <br />Fruitland Mesa Pcoject. TheSe roads. will be built aCCOrding to county <br />specifications and then Montrose County can accept the roads to the <br />county road system for maintenance. . <br /> <br /><J..l <-t1..",Z:,;J &,,.~ fr',A,t'JJ.t,;;?,...,.-<, ..w-cli-j; .....~ ~-,.,;l:4,~./"L <br /> <br />( 1. ,.j.' :1..,...t..-j..ft,t,(tt....l:.L:et.t....... .f/.I <br />te{' (/...1t..>t,.fO'-rr.. ,'" '~'i' d() I / j . 7 <br />/'.7 ..... i . Di {",;.VI "'.... tz.,4 i1ff.. - .1AJ l<- <br />IJ. r ~f..l} 4'''''' , ,;I' <br /> <br />/~~rl ~~'('~"it..f f"-(1r-' . <br />,/L'/;1.,,-; 1~n.t~(l <br /> <br />- ,....... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.