Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />0.- ".,.\ I <br />:Ju:':_'1 <br /> <br />P & M holds two separate rights for the Three Forks ReselVoir which is located on the <br /> <br />Wyoming-Colorado state line. The Colorado decrees for Three Forks and Sheep Mountain <br /> <br />ReselVoirs, dated June 5, 1972, each call for 75,000 AF of storage. The Wyoming permit <br /> <br />for Three Forks ReselVoir, dated June 20, 1972, is for a dam at the same location as the <br /> <br />Colorado Three Forks ReselVoir decree except with a storage amount of 22,865 AF. <br /> <br />According to P & M, their future plans are to develop a single large dam on the <br /> <br />Little Snake River with a total capacity of 172,865 AF at the common site of its Wyoming <br /> <br />Three Forks Permit and Colorado Three Forks Decree to embody the full entitlement of <br /> <br />these rights as well as the Sheep Mountain ReselVoir Decree water. Therefore, the July <br /> <br />31,1990 study evaluated the impacts of a consolidated Three Forks ReselVoir with 172,685 <br /> <br />AF of storage. P & M holds no direct flow diversion rights under this project. <br /> <br />Modeled project demands included storage water diversions for industrial uses. It <br /> <br />was assumed that the industrial water would be diverted directly from the reselVoir area <br /> <br />and 100 percent consumed with no return flows. To quantify realistic industrial demands <br /> <br />that the reselVoir could meet on a year to year basis, WWC performed a firm yield <br /> <br />evaluation using the WIRSOS model. <br /> <br />Bypass flow requirements for instream flow considerations were included in the <br /> <br />WIRSOS modeling. An instream flow requirement of 100 cfs has been suggested for the <br /> <br /> <br />Little Snake River below Savery Creek by the Wyoming Game and Fish Department. Of <br /> <br />this 100 cfs, it was assumed that 24 cfs would come from Savery Creek and Sandstone <br /> <br />ReselVoir storage releases as modeled in the Sandstone Depletion Study (SWEC, 1987), <br /> <br />4 <br />