My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07832
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07832
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 10:01:17 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:37:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8147
Description
Gunnison-Arkansas Project
State
CO
Water Division
4
Date
2/27/1951
Author
CWCB
Title
Report of Policy and Review Committee with Proposed Principles of Operation - Appendix A
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.~. f"4)~''''90 <br />.1.,""1;>"-' <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />--.:.....--_.-_-=.._-. <br /> <br />---- <br />---- <br /> <br />- -. <br />_n____ <br /> <br />---- <br />-- --- --- <br /> <br />---- <br />---- - <br /> <br />." <br /> <br />(i' <br /> <br />minutes-of-the-July-2~,-1949-meeting-held-at-GTenwooa-Springs, Colorado, <br /> <br />show that an active capacity of 28,000 acre-feet should be provided at <br /> <br />the Aspen Reservoir site. A part of such capacity in excess of replacement <br /> <br />requirements would be available for future use in meeting demands in Western <br /> <br />Colorado. It was aereed that the total cost of the proposed Aspen Reservoir <br /> <br />estimated at ~7,OOO,000, should be included in the construction costs of the <br /> <br />exportation project, but at this time the Committee has not resolved the <br /> <br />policy question as to the manner of payment for the active capacity in <br /> <br />Aspen Reservoir not needed for replacement purposes. A special subcommittee <br /> <br />appointed todraf~~~lesof op~ra~ion~sp.far .as it.pertains_~o .West-Slope--'~---' <br /> <br />-. --- <br />East Siope-:r.elit10nship 'was asked-to :consfdeI- this' problem. <br /> <br />- - --- <br />- - -- - - - -- - <br /> <br />The'. ad??~~_a__='~- -_~ <br /> <br />policy of tlie estate on-. thisCjuesJ'~?n' W:ilL~e made. availabre to. the;:Btireau==:';:::'--:- <br />prior to the authorization of the project. <br /> <br />Preservation of Fish and Wildlife <br /> <br />The Committee considered c~~ents from representatives of Federal <br /> <br />Fish and Wildlife Service and the State Game and Fish Commission with <br /> <br />respect to the maintenance of stream flows in the Frying Pan River at the <br /> <br />collection conduit and at Norrie below the junction of North Fork. The <br /> <br />Committee adopts the tentative schedule of flows shown in the report of <br /> <br />the Engineering Advisory Subcommittee dated December 30, 1949, as it is <br /> <br />understood that the Fish and ~ildlife Service and the State Game and Fish <br /> <br />Commission are in agreement with the schedule of minimum average flows <br /> <br />described therein. <br /> <br />The Committee recom~ends that loss of, and damage to, fishery <br /> <br />values in Roaring Fork River and its tributaries above Aspen Reservoir <br /> <br />-7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.