My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07787
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07787
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:28:55 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:36:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8277.100
Description
Salinity Projects Not Located in Colorado - Colorado River Salinity Control Forum
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
9/1/1981
Title
Salinity Control and Environmental Assessment - part 2
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />RESOURCE USE <br /> <br />For <br /> <br />CROPLAND AND PASTURELAND PRODUCTION <br /> <br />Description of Area: <br /> <br />Virgin Valley Sub evaluation Unit, Arizona, Nevada, Utah <br /> <br />Parameters <br /> <br />Unit <br /> <br />Present <br />Conditions <br /> <br />Future Conditions <br />Plazmin<> Alternatives <br />Future I I <br />Without 1 2 <br /> <br />The salinity hazard associated with Alternative 2 should result in less than <br />five percent yield reduction of alfalfa, under steady state conditions, assuming <br />all the applied water has an electrical conductivity of 3.5 mmho/cm. This salinity <br />is representative of the maximum levels, which occur under low flow conditions <br />during the summer months, and was used to assess the maximum potential effects of <br />salinity on crop growth. Below are average soil water electrical conductivity and <br />associated yield reduction for alfalfa for the management options given in Table 8. <br />The electrical conductivities were calculated using the composition of the irrigation <br />water reported by USGS for August 24, 1176 (Ca - 30.9; Mg - 5.8; Na - 7.4; K - 0.6; <br />C1 - 6.5; RCO - 5.2; S04 - 33.3 meq L- ) and leaching fractions, corrected for <br />runoff, ca1cutated from water balance data reported in Table 8. The high calcium <br />and sulfate concentrations reduce the salinity hazard of this water because of gypsum <br />precipitation. <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />CALCULATED SOIL WATER ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITIES AND <br />ASSOCIATED YIELD REDUCTION FOR ALFALFA <br /> <br /> Future Without <br />Factor Salinity Program Alternative 1 Alternative 2 <br /> 1./ <br />Leaching fraction 0.55 0.38 0.22 <br />Average root zone <br />Salinity (mmho/cm) (1) 3.8 4.3 5.0 <br />Projected yield <br />reduction (%) (2) 0 1 4 <br /> <br />"l-. <br />,(, <br /> <br />':.... <br />.;;}; <br /> <br />1/ Leaching fraction equals seasonal deep percolation divided by the quantity, <br />seasonal gross application minus seasonal net runoff. <br /> <br />SOURCE: Page A-12, Oster, J. D., U.S. Salinity Laboratory Correspondence. <br />1981., <br />(1) Oster, J. D., and J. D. Rhoades, 1977 (see Bibliography). <br />(2) Maas, E. V. and G. J. Roffman, 1977 (see Bibliography). <br /> <br />A-12 <br /> <br />. ~ r t", 0 <br />o 'J (, ..,. ,j J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.