Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />, <br />i <br /> <br />6 REP()~ ON OOWRADO RWER STORAGE PRO\rEOT <br />, <br />Res~rvoir ope~ations will necessarily depend upon the conditions <br />of use; of flow, jtndof storage as they develop. If, in the course of <br />actual operatioqs during the period 1958-70,. there are appreciable <br />deviations from; average flows the foregoing premises, including the <br />criteria for ope~ation of Glen Canyon. and Hoover, should be. re- <br />considered.! . . <br />Application a':'d further discussion of; and the resulting computa- <br />tions under the Joregoing basic premises are contained hereinafter. . <br /> <br />j ASSUMED STREAMFLOW CONDITIONS <br /> <br />. AnassumptiO\1 as to expected streamflows is necessary in any <br />reservoir-~I!ing Slemonstration. The ass~mption of averag~ stream- <br />flow conditIons Isa reasonable one for this study. ReserVOir opera- <br />tion studies pr4sented herein assume average streamflow 'at Glen <br />Canyon equal t$ that obtained from the period 1914-45, inclusive, <br />modified to reflqct present conditions of development and progres- <br />sively reduced e1\ch year through the operation period consistent witb <br />a projected .SCh~.' dule of increasing annual depletions. .Of course, <br />streamflow reali ed at Glen Canyon will depart from the average <br />in any given ye '., but speculation involving variant& in the develop- <br />ing physical sltu~tion is premature and would not be useful. . . <br />Lake Mead stprage reached a low point immediately prior .to the <br />1957 flood seasolildue to a recent drought (1953-56 bemg the lowest <br />4 years in seque1\cein the history of the Colorado River). The flood <br />runoff in 1957 was considerably greater than average and Lake Mead <br />activestorage cohtent is expected to be 20.0 million acre-feet on April <br />1, 1958. Therefore the operation studies be~in April 1, 1958, with <br />Lake Mead activie storage content of 20,0 milhon acre-feet. <br />Historically the annual flow at the Glen Canyon Dam site aver- <br />aged. 1.3.8 miliio* acre-feet during the 32-year. period 1914. to. 1..945, <br />inclusive. Whe1 modified to reflect present conditions of develop- <br />ment in the upper basin, the average annual flow is about 13.1 million <br />acre-feet. Furt~er developments in .tbe upper basill, such as con. <br />struction of wa~er-consuming projects and storage reservoirs, will <br />require further adjustment in .the expectec!f1ow. Table I is atabulll- <br />tion of the flows' to be expected. in the.,near future at Glen Canyon <br />Dam. assuming lliverage streamflow conditions. <br /> <br />TABLE I <br /> <br />[MnItonacre.feetJ <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />,. <br />i <br />Year beg~InF Apr. 1- <br /> <br />Adjustment for new <br />upstream uses <br /> <br />Assumed <br />fuflowto <br />Glen Cnnyon <br />-Reservoir <br /> <br />Averagefiow <br />at Glen <br />Oanyon Dam <br />. \vitli prosent Oonsumptive Upstream <br />> development use fncludJng storage ll'alns <br />evaporation <br /> <br />1958'.*__h.n_~_~~~__"h.L__________U"__~_~_h <br />1959_.__._-_~~_n_____.n__~_".~.._______~_._"_. <br />ID60n___.______.__~_.._~_~"__________"n__n___ <br />1961.:_______.h_____"____"l.._._.._.____"___"_.~. <br />1962___._.__u_.u.____"__~._._._._."..n__n___ <br />1963....~n__._____.......~__"___"___._..."_..__ <br /> <br />. !1I1~.~~ ~~~~ ~~j~.~~~ :~~~-~!:~~ :~:~ -:~ ~~~.~~~~~:_j <br /> <br />l : <br /> <br />i3.1 <br />13.'1 <br />13.1 <br />13.1: <br />13.1 <br />13.1 <br />13.-L <br />13.1 <br />13.1 <br />13.1 <br />13.1 <br />13.1. <br />13.1 <br /> <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />.1 <br />.1 <br />.3 <br />.3 <br />.. <br />., <br />., <br />.6 <br />.7 <br /> <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />., <br />., <br />.. <br />,. <br />.. <br />.8 <br />.6 <br />.. <br />.. <br />'-;4 <br /> <br />13.1 <br />13.1 <br />13.~ <br />12.9 <br />12.5 <br />12,'6 <br />12.4, <br />12,4- <br />:12<4 <br />12,0 <br />1~.2: <br />lU <br />l~O. <br />