Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CHAPTER I I <br /> <br />NEED F'OR ACTION <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2. Salt concentration occurs from consumptive use, which re- <br />duces water volume in the river without reducing the tota.l <br />amount of salt it carries. Examples include municipal and <br />industrial use, transpiration from crops and natural vege- <br />tation, and evaporation. <br /> <br />w <br />.:.. <br />00 <br />C) <br /> <br />As the water is used and reused several times along the len~th of <br />the river, these effects contribute to the increasing salinity. The <br />process is likely to continue since the potential demands on the river <br />exceed its dependable supply. <br /> <br />The high salt concentration in the Lower Colorado River Basin ad- <br />versely affects more than 17 million people and about I million acres of <br />irrigated farmland in the United States. Affected most severely are <br />municipal and industrial water users in the Las Vegas, Los Angeles, and <br />San Diego areas and irrigators in the Imperial Valley of southern Cali- <br />fornia who all experience economic losses. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />According to a 1980 study by the Water and Power Resources Service <br />(now Bureau of Reclamation), estimated economic losses in the Lower Colo- <br />rado River Basin averap;e 5540,000 annually for each increase of I mg/L <br />when salinity concentrations at Imperial Dam range from 875 to 1,225 mg/L <br />(based on January 1983 prices). The losses consist of 5378,000 in munic- <br />ipal and industrial losses and 5162,000 in agricultural impacts per mg/L, <br />Losses associated with municipal and industrial use occur pril'lari ly from <br />increased water treatment costs, accelerated pipe corrosion and appli- <br />ance wear, increased soap and detergent needs, and decreased drinking <br />water palatabi Ihy. For irrigators, the higher concentrat ions calise de- <br />creased crop yields, altered crop patterns, increased leachin~ and drain- <br />age requirements, and increased management costs. Other unestimated and <br />indirect losses occur in the Upper Colorado River Basin, <br /> <br />The historical salt load fluctuates annually with the overall ~asin <br />water supply, Between 1949 and 1970. the general trend of the concen- <br />tration at Imperial Dam was upward. Since 1970, however, the concentra- <br />tion has decreased both as a result of Colorado River Storage Project <br />(CRSP) reservoirs mixing high and low TDS water and as a result of a <br />generally more moist weather pattern increasing the amount of water <br />available to dilute the salts, The future salinity concentration at <br />Imperial Dam through the ye.u 2010 without water quality improvement <br />projects is expected to follow an overall rising trend as depletions <br />continue to increase. <br /> <br />In response to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and its <br />amendments (Public Law 92-500, 1972), the seven Colorado River Basin <br />States adopted and the Environmental Protection ~ency approved 1972 <br />salinity concentrations at three points on the Lower Colorado River as <br />salinity control standards. The standards are shown in Table 1, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />8 <br />