Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,"~, <: ., "i 1 <br />U',?.-'. . Li <br />tu 1.000,000 <br />w <br />"- 900,000 <br />Li.J <br />a: <br />u 800,000 <br /><0: <br />~ 700,000 <br />w' <br />OJ <br />a: 600,000 <br /><0: <br />J: <br />U 500,000 <br />Ul <br />is <br />:;; 400,000 <br /><0: <br />w 300,000 <br />a: <br />f- <br />Ul <br />-' 200,000 <br /><0: <br />:0 <br />Z 100,000 <br />Z <br /><0: <br /> 0 <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.. <br />. <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />f- 1,000,000 <br />w IZ1 Site 3A (Sites 1 and 2) <br />w 900.000 <br />"- . Site 3A to Site 3 <br />Li.J <br />a: 800,000 . Site 3 to Site 4 <br />U <br /><0: IS! Site 4 to Site 5 <br />~ 700,000 o Site 5 to Site 6 <br />vi 600,000 <br />Ul <br />0 <br />-' 500,000 <br />Z <br /><( 400,000 <br />OJ <br />:;; 300,000 <br /><0: <br />w <br />a: <br />f- 200,000 <br />Ul <br />-' 100,000 <br /><0: <br />:0 <br />Z 0 <br />z <br /><0: <br /> <br />Maximum <br /> <br />...... <br /> <br />..' <br /> <br />.... <br />JI,...,.......... <br /> <br />Average <br /> <br />'f-_ _....-----..,.....----.: <br />-__......__- MinImum <br /> <br />3A <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />3 <br />SITE <br /> <br /> <br />-100,000 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 <br />WATER YEAR <br /> <br />Figure 5. Average and range of annual stream discharge for the North Fork (site 1), the South Fork (site 2), and the <br />main stem of the White River (sites 3A-6), water years 1975-88, and annual stream discharge gain-loss for segments <br />of the White River between sites. <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />Flow-duration curves for station 09304500 and <br />sites 1,2, and 4 for water years 1975-88 are compared <br />with the long-term (water years 1910-88) flow-duration <br />curve for station 09304500 (fig. 6). A comparison of <br />the short- and long-term flow-duration curves for <br />station 09304500 indicates that high stream discharges <br />in the White River during water years 1975-88 were <br />slightly greater than the long-term average, and low <br />stream discharges were slightly less than the long-term <br />average. The convergence of the flow-duration curve <br />for site I with the curves for station 09304500 and <br />site 4 in low flows (less than 100 ft3/S) indicates that <br />stream discharge from the North Fork is the principal <br /> <br />source of water in the White River during very dry peri- <br />ods. The decreases in daily streamflow that occur <br />along the flow-duration curves at percentage of time <br />values greater than 95 percent for station 09304500 and <br />site 4 probably were caused by streamflow depletions <br />resulting from irrigation diversions. Streamflow deple- <br />tions from proposed reservoirs also would affect flow- <br />duration values in the White River and are discussed in <br />Kuhn and Ellis (1984). <br /> <br />Annual stream discharges from sites I and 2 for <br />water years 1952-88 (Hutchison, 1975) were summed <br />(site 3A), and a regression was made with period-of- <br />record for water-content measurements of snowpack at <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION 9 <br />