Laserfiche WebLink
<br />f- <br />UJ <br />UJ <br />u.. <br />W <br />0: <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />, ,000,000 <br />900,000 <br />800,000 <br />700,000 <br />600,000 <br />500,000 <br />400.000 <br />300,000 <br />200,000 <br />100,000 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />SITE 5 <br /> <br />. MEASURED VALUE <br />o CALCULATED VALUE: sum of Qa at site 4 <br />and gaging station 09306222 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />-' <br /> <br />. <br />Q <br /> <br />UJ <br />" <br />0: <br /><( <br />J: <br />U <br />(/) <br />is 1.000.000 <br />::;: 900.000 <br /><( <br />UJ <br />0: <br />f- <br />(/) <br />-' <br /><( <br />::J <br />Z <br />Z <br /><( <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Ij <br /> <br />~ @ <br />i' <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />800,000 <br /> <br />. MEASURED VALUE <br /> <br />o CALCULATED VALUE: sum of Qa at site 4 <br />and gaging stations 09306222 and 09306255 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />400.000 <br />300.000 <br />200.000 <br />100,000 <br />o <br />o 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 1,000,000 <br />ANNUAL STREAM DISCHARGE 10,) AT SITE 4, IN ACRE-FEET <br /> <br />700,000 <br /> <br />600.000 <br /> <br />500,000 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />SITE 6 <br /> <br />~!,@ <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Figure 4. Correlation of calculated (water years 1975-88) and measured (water years 1983-88) annual stream <br />discharge at site 5 and calculated (water years 1975-82) and measured (water years 1983-88) annual stream <br />discharge at site 6 with measured annual stream discharge at site 4. <br /> <br />Statistical summaries for annual stream dis- <br />charge at sites 1-6 and for the combined stream dis- <br />charges of sites 1 and 2 (site 3A) are shown in figure 5; <br />discharge data for sites 1-6 and stations 09306222, <br />09306255, and 09306300 are listed in table 2. The <br />combined discharges (site 3A) of the North Fork <br />(site 1) and South Fork (site 2) accounted for about <br />78 percent of the stream discharge of the White River <br />upstream from site 6. The relation of annual stream- <br />discharge contributions from subbasins (defined as the <br />drainage area between sites) to annual stream discharge <br />in the White River also are shown in figure 5. Stream- <br />discharge losses that occurred between site 3A and site <br />3 were caused by streamflow diversions upstream from <br />site 3 for irrigation of croplands in the Meeker area. <br />Undetennined quantities of irrigation return flow con- <br />tributed, in parl, to the stream discharge measured at <br />site 4. <br /> <br />Annual streamflow contributions to the White <br />River from the semiarid tributary basins between <br />sites 4 and 6 were small compared with the combined <br /> <br />8 Sediment Tronsport ond Woter-QuoUly Chorocterlstlcs ond Loods, Whlto River, Northwestern Colorodo, Wotor Veors <br />1975.88 <br /> <br />streamflows of the North Fork and South Fork Basins. <br />An exception to the pattern occurred in 1984 when <br />about 200,000 acre-ft of water entered the White River <br />downstream from site 4 from Piceance Basin and other <br />semiarid basins. The large runoff was a combination of <br />low-elevation snowmelt and a regional spring rain- <br />storm. <br />Annual stream discharge in most of the main <br />stem of the White River ranged from about 200,000 <br />acre-ft at sites 3A, 4, 5, and 6 during years of small run- <br />off to almost 1 million acre- ft at sites 5 and 6 during <br />years of large runoff. The average annual stream dis- <br />charge at site 6 for water years 1975-88 was about <br />577 ,000 acre-ft. Record maximum and minimum daily <br />stream discharges occurred in the White River during <br />water years 1975-88. Based on streamflow records for <br />78 continuous years (1910-88) at station 09304500, <br />daily discharge at this station near Meeker ranged from <br />78 ft3/s in 1977 to 6,320 ft3/s in 1984 (U.S. Geological <br />Survey, 1987-89). <br />