My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07699
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07699
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:28:30 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:32:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
6/1/1921
Author
Delph E. Carpenter
Title
Report and Supplemental Report of Delph E. Carpenter, Commissioner for Colorado on the Colorado River Commission in RE: Colorado River Compact
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />[ 2R ] <br /> <br /> <br />shall be a party, without regard to the subject of such contro- <br />versies, and that this COllrt may exercise original jurisdietion in <br />all such cases 'in the which a State shall be party,' without ex- <br />cluding those in which the United States may be the opposite <br />party." <br /> <br />The power to enter iIito compa.ct between a State or StateR <br />and the United States is founded upon the sam.e principle as the <br />power in the Supreme Court to settle controversies between <br />States, as said bl' Mr. Justice Harlan in the foregoing case (1" <br />(44), "VVe can not assume that the framers of the Oonstitution, <br />while exl-ending the judicial power of. the United States to con- <br />troversies between two 01' lIIore States of the Union and between <br />a State of the Union and foreign States, intended to exempt a <br />State altogether from suit by the General Government." <br /> <br />The above statement followed an analysis of the position <br />taken bl' 'l'exas (p, 641) : <br /> <br />"Texas insists that no such juriRdiction has been conf(>rred <br />npon this court, and that the only mode in which the present <br />dispute eun be peaceably settled is by agreement, in some form, <br />between the United States and that State, Of course, if no such <br />agreement can be reached-and it seems that onel is not probable <br />-and if' neither party will surrender its claim of authority and <br />jurisdirtiou over the disputed territory the result, according to <br />the defendallt's theorl'. of the Constitution, must be that the <br />United States, in order to effect a settlement of this vexed ques- <br />tion of boundary. must bring its suit in one of the courts of <br />'rexas * '* * 01' that, in the end, there mm;;t be a. trial of physical <br />strength between the Government of the Union and Texas." <br /> <br />The court decided that, inasmuch as the State and the United <br />States did not settle their controversl' bJ' compact, the Supreme <br />Oourt had the power to determine the controversy between the <br />United States and the State, . . <br /> <br />The right to settle bl' compact proceeds upon the sovereigntl' <br />of the State and the sovel'eigntl' of the Nation, As stated regard- <br />ing anothel~ matter, "It is a matter between two sovereign <br />powers." (U, S. 1', La" 127 U, S, 182, 189,) . <br /> <br />The following quotations bear UpOll this geueral subject of <br />power and separate sovereignty: <br /> <br />"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Con- <br />stitution, nor prohibited bl' it to the Fitates, are reserved to the <br />States, l'espeetively, Or to the people." (Constitution of the <br />United States, tenth amendment,) <br /> <br />"It must be recollected that previons to the formation of the <br />new Oonstitution we were divided into iudependent States, united. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.