My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07672
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07672
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 10:02:54 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:30:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8040.980
Description
Section D General Studies-Weather Modification
State
CA
Date
2/7/1951
Author
CAChamberofCommerce
Title
Scientific Economic and Legal Aspects of Weather Modification
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />arc devised. there seems no meons av~ileble to determine in ~hysical terms. Hith <br />even approximate accuracy, the amount of benefit or injury resulting from contrived <br />modifications. In f2.ct it seems impossible even to determine with anything near <br />exactness the amount of the changes resulting from humen tampering. <br /> <br />A resh of Dills concerning ,,'eather control which he.s appeared both in Congress a.nd <br />in state legislatures attests public preference to find solutions to the problems <br />posed. by legislation rather than court decisions. Opinion of recognized author- <br />ities generally has taken the ste.nd that both federal pnd stRte governments are <br />permittEd a verJ broad range for lawmaking in the field of >reather control ~y their <br />r~spective constitutions. Suggestions for ?ro~er action. thou~~ they have appeared <br />in g!t'eat numbers, can be classified under a. few main ~rinc1ples, >>hich ",ill be de- <br />scribed in the following para~raphs. <br /> <br />At the left end of the opinion spectrum is the demand that modification of climate <br />be recognized as e purely governmental function and socialized. Thus it would have <br />very much the same status as the postal service. Operations would be in the hands <br />of gove:"Ilment employees. TiOle, place end. qUflntity of activi ty Hould be determined <br />by governmental authority. Legislative bodies could decide the means of fina.nc1al <br />su~?ort, whether by general taxation, fees for service, special taxation Or com- <br />binations of these. As pointed out proviously, this course proba.bly ,./ould result <br />complete supremacy of the federal authority over this activity and the subordina- <br />tion of state end local government. <br /> <br />Not quite so ext:-ems is the suggestion that '.'eather control be declared a public <br />utility, as such to re:na.1n in private hands but to De subjected to a particular <br />kind of regulation. Supervision then could be from bodies such as state public util- <br />ities co~missions or at the federal level as the Interstate Commerce Commission and <br />the Federal Po"'er Commission. Certain priva.te firms might be given monopolies over <br />specific areas and required to render particular standards of service for specified <br />fees. Here also there would be the tendency for the states to become suborQinate <br />to the federal gove~nment unless legislation in Congress established a clear line of <br />demarcation between the two authorities. <br /> <br />t:- <br />O <br />\P <br />...-I <br /> <br />A third view is to leave matters of control entirely within the hands of the states. <br />,ach state has unique characteristics that are effected by climete in ways not fully <br />dU1)licated else",here. Furthermore, a.djoining states often have characteristics <br />co~mon such that they forr, natural economic units. It he.s been demonstrated fre- <br />quently that groups of states are a,ble to enter into com'lacts ,'hich function ef- <br />fectively. An injured state, ~der the federal Constitution, could still ask that <br />the 'jni ted States govern:nent enforce relief a@' inst encroachments by another state. <br />Obviously this sort of settlement is attended by dangers of federal encrooc~~ent <br />until it becomes possible to make more accurate determine.tions of fact than nt!lw seem <br />.Ii thin our abilities. States would be able to deal >lith parties entering the occu- <br />pa.tion of weather modification as in the case now of certa.in Skilled professions. <br />requiring proof of qualifications to meet a legally determined level of proficiency <br />and character and requiring also a license to operate. <br /> <br />Supremacy of state regulation could not ~revent federal agencies from engaging in <br />an;\' research or experimentation in the interest of national defense or any other <br />national function. <br /> <br />Another o?inion ",ould 1.Jlace ,"eether modification upon the same footing as the major- <br />ity of private non-utility business firms, subject to moderate regulation by both <br />federal and state governments. At the present 0 firm engaged in interstate business <br />is subject to such legislation as the anti-trust end minimum >rage lawe and is re- <br />soonsible to such agoncies a.s the Federel Trade Commission. At the state level are <br /> <br />- 11 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.