WSP07672 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . to feel that. because of tne effect of climatic control o~ national defense and interstate relations. state laH ...ill be subordin1?te to federal la>f in most instances I.,herein the federal government chooses to assert its pONer. The second. heading is the 'lO>ler of eminent domain. Under this a governmental aGency may tal~e. use or dp.mege private property for a public our;>ose, even against the will of the owner, provided it co~?ensates the o,'ner for any losses incurred by these actions. It is ma.intained the,t under t!lis po"'er a governmental e.gency could author- ize for itself the fu.~ction of weather control. This function might be exercised either by means of its own facilities or through representa.tives, licensees or fran- chise holders. That being true. any properly authorizec. pert". acting for a pro:?erly deter!Dined public purpose could engage in artificial weather modification o!,erations regardless of the objactions of any ~erson who feared injury or inconvenience as the result. ~le injured party then could receive compeneetion from t!le gover~~ental agency authorizing the operations to an amount deemed adequate by a duly constituted court, or by another official bo~' acceptable to both sides of the controversy. ~ne third and final heading is the police oo~er. This has been defined by eminent authority ao >,o,'er of regulation, designe.:i to iffi'!)ose uoon the o'.rner's \;.se end enjoJ'- ment of property the duty to do so use end enjoy it as not to interfere with the general ,"elf~re of the community in "hich loe lives. Such regulation may go to the extreme of physical destruction of the property or some part of it or of such res- triction on its use as greatly to reduca its velue. It is sometimes very difficult to determine the line bshreen the power of e!Dinent dO!D8.in end the :?olice po>rer.' This separation is extremely important beceuse many ections under the police power Can be carried out ..ithout liability for pa.yment for de.mage. Because er.erclse of polica DOHer can result in sacrifice of an individual to the group, courts have tended to be strict in their comtel!lpl"tion of acts ..hich ".re claimed to be in "ccordance 1'lith it. Yet they have psrreitted it to go be)'ond the po,"er merely to regulate end !:eve exte:1cei it to the pONer to tp.ke and damage prop- erty ,',henever this appeared necessary to r,lUblio health, safety 1?nd welfare. If such ect remains entirely ,rithin the police po"er, in~ured parties neve no recourse. In some cases public '.-'orks have been held to ce "'Hhin this power, though there is a line of rulings that tends to re~,uire tr.at such >forks as "'ell as damage to la.>rful ',Jroperty be necessitate,l by emergen-:y conditions. It is not unreasonable to expect thpt goverrunente.l agencies ma;\, claim i"'mu.'1it~' f!'om l1abili t~. for injury resulting frc.::J \'.'e1?t:,er control operatior.s on the ground the.t these or,>erations ','ere within the police power. The foregoing discussion of legal a.spects was not presented >lith any idea. of set- ting up adequate gucde p03tS thrOUGh a ma.e that is ba.ffling Our most learned ju!'ists. Rether it ','a.s hoped first, to ShCI1 in 'brief p.nd generp-l ';erms '.,hat a')oears to be the prevailing, but b;r no mear.s unanimous, thinking on the present l~gal sta.tus of climate control eni second. to demonstrate the complexities with ,mich our courts are confrontec'- because of this ne>' ci.eyelopment. It seeOlS to be pretty widely agreed th.'>t the precedents embodied in existing la." Qrovide little better than generp.l rules of thumb when a,??lied to this fiel~. There are no completely applicable legal narec8dents and no definite authoritetive ~eiinitions to cover the pO\-lers, ri~~ts -8'd lie.bilities of parties ,'rho >rUlfully interfere '.r1th the natural processes of the pther. ....... ~stablishment of adequp.te rules in the absence of legislation probably would rest upon a large nwnber of decisions ,.,hich have been h"nded do'm by the SUL:reme Court of the United States over a period of several years. For that matter, a. certein amount of ne'" legislatiGn also Hould have to run the geuntlet of the courts. j.:ore comrylex e. r,>roblem even then the for"Julation of ,,".equate legal rules '.-lould be the determina- tion of fact.' Until auantitative meesursments of the erratic >fea.ther manifestations - 10 ~.