Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ r P-t....., <br />q~. I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />IV-2l. The statement does not indicate damages to <br />lower Colorado River. The United States does have <br />Mexico to ~ salinity in the river. <br /> <br />Mexico water users on the <br />the responsibility with <br /> <br />IV-B3. <br />be the <br />mental <br /> <br />Under construction impacts (29a), the most lasting road impact ~11 <br />increased access into primitive areas with possible resultant environ- <br />degradation. <br /> <br />IV-B7. When will the BO-foot season fluctuation occur at Pueblo Reservoir? <br />Will it coincide with waterfowl migration times? What ~ll the effect be on <br />food supply, edge, cover, resting or wintering habitat? Will the fluctuation <br />enhance or inhibit the population? These questions should be addressed before <br />evaluating the overall impact as beneficial as is done on pages IV-90 and IX- <br />16. What are the specific projections for the 2,000 acres the reservoir will <br />create as compensation? Where ~ll the waterfo~l ~hich ~nter at the Reservoir <br />be displaced from? <br /> <br />V-4. The contract should specify that rehabilitation will be assured. The <br />contractor should also be required to seed abandoned roads and cleared areas <br />after scarifying. <br /> <br />V-80 and V-Bl. The access for increased recreational opportunities does not <br />seem to be a mitigating measure, but an accruing benefit. A mitigating mea- <br />sure might be the use of selective management policies to limit overuse of <br />the site or to prevent irreversible impact on surrounding areas. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />V-83. What ~11 the mitigating measures be to "protect adjacent wilderness <br />areas" and where are these areas? <br /> <br />AppendiX A is somewhat misleading. It purports to sho~ interagency input <br />t"n t"hic;. J),..~ft- (~nrl ""...,..1':",.. ri_...F... ~.._..____..._ __ _____.. .'. r.. ..' <br />.--- ----- ,--.- -_____... .................. ~...Q...<;;~1Lo;~u_,:) VU ....VULpVUt::UL:;,. UJ.. Ll1~ }JrOjecc). <br />We have no ~ay to know if the material "selected" for publication here is <br />representative of other agency input, but it is obviously incomplete. The <br />Final EIS on The Fryingpan-Arkansas Project should publish and respond to <br />all comments on the subject Draft and those receiv~d on prior draft state- <br />ments on several components of The Project. <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />1> ~~~.~ <br /> <br />XI-236 <br /> <br />. <br />