My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07644
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07644
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:28:15 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:29:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8141.600.20
Description
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project - Studies - Environmental Studies
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
5
Date
4/16/1975
Author
US DoI BoR
Title
Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 2 of 2, Pages XI-231 to XI-421
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />United States Department of the Interior <br /> <br />1 !-r ~~""\. {) <br />'iJ"'.}- <br /> <br />NATIONAL PARK SERVICE <br />WASHINGTON, D,C, 20240 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />IN REPLY REFER TO: <br /> <br />L7619 (RMR)CS <br /> <br />MAY 30 ~74 <br /> <br />Memorandum <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />Commissioner, Bureau of <br /> <br />Reclamation <br />Fish and Wildlife~~V~\~ <br />~\(-/ yO <br />~':> <br /> <br />Through: Assistant Secretary for <br />Parks <br />. -d!}~~ <br />From: '~~rector <br /> <br />Subject: Review of Draft Environmental Statement for the <br />Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, Colorado (DBS 74-32) <br /> <br />As requested in your memorandum of April 17, 1974, we have <br />reviewed the subject material and offer the following <br />comments. <br /> <br />No established or studied units of the National Park System <br />appear to be adversely affected by t~e proposal. The pro- <br />posal does not appear to adversely affect any site registered <br />as a National Historic or Environmental Education Landmark. <br />We cannot be sure that the same applies with reference to <br />Garden Park Fossil Area which is in the near vicinity of a <br />section of the project area. The Final Environmental Impact <br />Statement should recognize the existence of this Natural. <br />Landmark and clearly establish whether the project will have <br />dn impact upon i~. We also note that Russell LaKes are.near <br />the area of project development. Since these are wetlands <br />with potential for Natural Landmark designation, all such <br />land requires protection from any developments that could <br />have an adverse impact. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The statement indicates (p. VIII-3) consultation of the <br />National Register of Historic Places. However, the final <br />statement should establish that the Federal Register for <br />February 19, 1974, which lists all National Register entries <br />up to that date, and the Supplements, which are published on <br />the first Tuesday of each month, were consulted. The state- <br />ment identifies a number of historic buildings and conveys <br />the impression that there may be others, none of which are <br />on the National Register. In accordance with the Historic <br />Preservation Act of 1966, the National Environmental Policy <br /> <br />~"'~ HOIj>... <br />&'~ <br />-'VZ <br />'76 <br /> <br />XI-248 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Let's Clean Up America For Our 200lh Birthday <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.