Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.'v-v....SRO/CO~".'~ <br />. .. _' _ ,.~__~ ..:;__:o.1oi.~~ <br />.~ . - .' . ~. , <br />_ " ~ : _h~. <br />. -- <br />. . 0.0.-" <br /> <br />/917 AUG::2 AH /0: 37 <br /> <br />,.......r- <br />) /"J t b\:GINEER OFFJf'~ <br />S;:NTi~ FE N" ...t <br />. . I"f~ <br /> <br />Southern Rio Grande Council of Governments <br />575 So. Alameda St. City/County Office Bldg. <br /> <br />Las Cruces, New Mexico Zip Code 88001 <br /> <br />Ph. 523.7474 - State Network Number 588"5146 <br />", J.' <br /> <br />July.- 27, 1977 <br /> <br />N'lW l1exi co Interstate" Stream Conrni ss ion <br />3d"..J.an ;'iemoria1 Building <br />~lnta Fe, New Mexico 87503 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Slinger1an <br /> <br />Upon review of the Rio Grande Region, Specific Problem Analysis Sum~ary, the <br />following comments are offered. <br /> <br />(1) . <br /> <br />The report would b: improved and easier interpreted if the data of the <br />"Specific Problem Analysis" were in the rear of the report as pat.t of an <br />appendix. The data could then be referred to by the reader as needed. <br /> <br />.?) <br />t~ . <br /> <br />A rather picayune point but the use of the term "region" is not an <br />accurate use of the term. The term "area" would be Itore appropriate. <br />(Refer to a geographer's manual or even the dictionary). <br /> <br />The map of Rio Grande-Region 13 does not clearly or easily identify the <br />aggregated sub-areas. <br /> <br />(4). There appears to be no basis for the assessment that there will be negative <br />effects upon roads or streets or urban recreation. Population increase may <br />r.ot be detrimental. <br /> <br />(3). <br /> <br />Th:: n:p()rt~ appears technically currect and we11 presented and very \'Iorthy. <br /> <br />Sincerely yours, <br /> <br />::- ~ <br />-.-- . f . . <br />" ". <br />r-- " ..- .' <br />" ~c..C"'/""""" .d.a. <br />.7 - / - t:/ <br />Loring Spitler <br />Ragional Planner <br /> <br />LS: 1 P <br /> <br />0031:16 <br /> <br />87 <br />