My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07502
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07502
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:27:37 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:25:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8441.100
Description
The Colorado Big Thompson Project - Project Description
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
4/28/1950
Title
Public Hearing on Estes Park Area Transmission Lines - General Statement by James H Knights
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Project Overview
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />o <br />l':) <br />..... <br />l\"l <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />the' overhead lines with that of the underground cable, but experience has <br /> <br />pr~vedthe hazards of overhead lines to be greatly overemphasized. <br /> <br />In determining a single construction plan from the several alterna- <br /> <br />. tives represented in Exhibits "C" and "D", the Bureau was faoed with the <br /> <br />practical necessity for reconciling esthetic considerations with realistio <br /> <br />eoonomic faots. Obviously from an esthetio viewpoint the underground <br /> <br />oable alternate (Route "B") was far superior to any of the alternates <br /> <br />studied. However, from an eoonomio viewpoint, alternate "B" would cost <br /> <br /> <br />over 5! times as muoh as the most satisfactory overhead route. It is <br /> <br /> <br />basic Reclamation policy that construction be undertaken on a sound and <br /> <br />businesslike basis to assure that faoilities construoted with publio funds <br /> <br /> <br />be oompleted at minimum reasonable oost in order to return maximum bene- <br /> <br />fits to the public at large. Weighing the esthetio oonsideration against <br /> <br />the eoonomic oonsideration and fitting both within the framework of Bureau <br /> <br />polioy, it seemed olear that the eoonomio consideration should take pre- <br /> <br />cedenoe if the entire publio welfare were to be faithfully served. <br /> <br />In calling this publio hearing for today, I wish to point out the <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />unusual problem with whioh our Regional Direotor was oonfronted. W~thout <br /> <br />exception, so far as I know, publio hearings are held by Reolamation to <br /> <br />learn the publio sentiments for or against plans Reclamation has derived <br /> <br /> <br />for proposed.oonstruction. It is Bureau practioe to give fullest possible <br /> <br />weight to looal sentiments 'in the shaping of final construction plans. In <br /> <br />this case, however, we are meeting today to discuss the merits of a trans- <br /> <br />mission line plan not only fully settled upon, and with most rights-of-way <br /> <br />procured, but also aotually under construction oontraot. Quite frankely <br /> <br />we believed until only a few days ago that we had fully disoharged our <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br /> <br />.- "-'''' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.