Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />l'\:l <br />C> <br />CJl <br />to <br /> <br />SCALE <br />1150,000 <br /> <br />LEGEND <br /> <br />m = Irrigated I 'n ! (1965) <br /> <br />. = Potentially Arable Land <br /> <br />N <br /> <br />Fil!;ure 1.7, <br /> <br />Irrigated and put.l~ntial1y arable land in the Price River Basin (Utah Division of <br />Water Resources 1975), <br /> <br />salt contribution from irrigation range from <br />about 6 percent, or 15,000 tons per year, by <br />Hyatt et a1. (1970) to about 33 percent, <br />or 80,000 tons per year by Gifford et al. <br />(1975). <br /> <br />Ponce (1975) conducted an intensive <br />field investigation of salt pickup by over- <br />land flows crossing Mancos Shale wildlands. <br />Overland runoff was generated at several <br />geologic locations in attempts to quantify <br />salt movement, erosion, <,lod loading rates. <br />Spatial heterogeneit'y, however, was so <br />extreme that the results are inconclusive. <br />His best hypothesis was that salt pickup can <br />be described as a function of dilution (added <br />water increasing transport capacity), erosion <br />(separation of sediment particles from <br />natural formations), dissolution (separation <br />of the salt ions from the sediment parti- <br />cles), and an interaction of the three. He <br />fit six empirical salt uptake equations to <br />the observed data and achieved the best <br />correlation (r2 = 0.64) with the function: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />TDSt ~ Bo + B1P - BrQs <br />in which <br /> <br />(1.17) <br /> <br />of <br /> <br />the <br /> <br />Predicted salinity <br />surface runoff <br />= Precipitation rate <br />Surface runoff rate <br />BI, and Br = Constants <br /> <br />TDSt <br /> <br />P <br />Qs <br />Bo, <br /> <br />Ponce (1975) concluded that the salt <br />load that occurs with surface runoff is <br />largely related to erosion. His quantitative <br />analysis indicated that surface salt loading <br />is not a unique function of rainfall in- <br />tensity but also depends on many other <br />unspecified factors. He also estimated that <br />only 0.5 percent of the total salt loading at <br />woodside can be attributed to overland <br />flow from natural areas. <br /> <br />Whitmore (1976) sampled Mancos Shale at <br />nine different sites within the Price River <br />valley. Based on laboratory analyses of <br />these samples, he proposed that salt dissolu- <br />tion is diffusion controlled and that two <br />distinct dissolution rates occur. One is a <br />fast reaction in which 80 to 90 percent of <br />the available salt is released from the shale <br />surface within the first 2 minutes after <br />runoff across it begins. A second slower <br />reaction occurs as the remaining salt slowly <br />goes into solution. The fast rates are <br />attributed to indigenous salt on particles at <br />the surface of the soil, and the slow rates <br />are thought to reflect mineral weathering. <br /> <br />White (1977a) examined salt production <br />from microchannels in the Price River valley. <br />He documented the extreme surface mineral <br />heterogeneity of the channels and described <br />the salinity uptake in the channels as a <br />rapid dissolution of surface salts followed <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />