Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />Table 1. 2, Water budget for the valley floor area of the Price River Basin (adapted from Hyatt <br />et a1. 1970), <br /> <br /> Water (AF/yr) Salt (Tons/yr) <br /> Inflows Outflows Inflows Out flows <br /> Measured Surface 70,000 68,000 20,000 220,000 <br /> Unmeasured Surface 28,000 45,000 <br />l\.,) Precipitation 15,000 <br />0 Natural Loading 168,000 <br />C)1 Agricultural Loading 15,000 <br />Subsurface 4,000 28,000 <br />I-' Phreatophyte Consumptive Use 5,000 <br /> Evapotranspiration from Soil 36,000 <br /> TOTAL 113,000 113,000 248,000 248,000 <br />_._n___ <br /> <br />Willardson et a1. (1979) published a <br />chemical model of soll-irrigation water <br />cation exchange. An application to the <br />Ashley Valley of Utah examined the sensi- <br />t ivity of streamflows and salinity to irri- <br />gation water management alternatives and <br />found the salinity of the streamflow to he <br />most sensitive to increases in water con- <br />veyance efficiency (canal lining). The <br />effect of the lining, however, would depend <br />on how the water saved was used. <br /> <br />Peterson et a1. (1980) used experiments <br />on the rate of salt release from Mancos <br />Shale dedved salls to calibrate a chemical <br />equilibrium model, derived from ion associa- <br />tion theory, in interface with a kinetic <br />model of salt release. The model was able <br />to predict rates of salt release from sus- <br />pended sediment. <br /> <br />Narasimhan et a1. (1.980) reviewed <br />development of the hydrosa1inity modeling art <br />in terms of usefulness for water management <br />decision making. They examined the assump- <br />tions, approaches, data requirements, and <br />applications for 17 existing models. Eigbt <br />models portrayed water and salt movement down <br />a stream or through a river basin by using <br />steady-state relationships, treating salinity <br />as a single conservative constituent (TnS), <br />and using long time increments (generally <br />months). Two models treat individual ions <br />in the soil-water system, and four more <br />integrate soil-water chemistry with solute <br />transport. Finally, three models also <br />reflect groundwater chemical reactions within <br />the water or between the water and the <br />aquifer. <br /> <br />~zdrosa1inity of the Price River Basin <br /> <br />The Price River flows average (1931- <br />1960) 239,000 tons of salt and 71,800 acre- <br />feet of water. According to Jeppson et al. <br />(1968), the Price River contributes only 0,66 <br />percent of the flow to the Colorado River at <br />Lee Ferry while its salt contribution is 2.79 <br />percent of the total. No other major tribu- <br /> <br />tary of the Upper Colorado River has such a <br />high salr to water ratio (about 2450 mg/1). <br /> <br />Furthermore, Mundorff (1972) has noted <br />that there are few identifiable point sources <br />adding salinity to the Price River flow. <br />Rather, the salt sour~es appear to be widely <br />diffused over the basin and affect all major <br />Price River tributaries. During average or <br />low flow periods, salinity concentrations <br />are bigh in all of them. <br /> <br />On natural lands, weathering processes <br />and vadous human activities expose soluble <br />minerals at the ground surface. Rainfall <br />causes runoff that dissolves some of these <br />salts and erodes sediments that carry more. <br />In addition the churning action grinds <br />the sediments as overland flow collects in <br />ephemeral channels, exposing more soluble <br />minerals. Additional water infiltrates to <br />interact with the soil in depos it ing and <br />dissolving salts before emerging as interflow <br />or groundwater discharge. <br /> <br />Salts from all these sources (as well as <br />from i rdgated lands) concentrate in the <br />channels. Iorns et a1. (1965) indicated that <br />the flow in the Price River alternately moves <br />from the stream into the alluvium and back <br />again. The interchange between water <br />and alluvium deposits salts in the bed <br />during low flow periods and contributes <br />to the deterioration of water quality during <br />high flows. In addition during high flows, <br />additional salts enter the flow as channel <br />banks erode and collapse into the stream. <br />These banks may be particularly high in salt <br />content where salts have been left behind by <br />evaporation from seepage during low flow <br />periods. <br /> <br />During the growing season, the Price <br />River is almost entirely diverted for irriga- <br />tion of about 20,000 acres or about 8 percent <br />of the valley area (see Figure 1.7), The <br />principal canals serving the area are the <br />Price-Wellington, Carbon, and the McFadden <br />branch of the Cleveland Canal. Water in the <br />latter is imported from Huntington Creek in <br />the San Rafael River Basin. Estimates of the <br /> <br />8 <br />