Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4210 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />important mineral deposit is found and economics permit its <br />development. It may also be possible to process the tunnel <br />muck disposal areas on the chance that something valuable may <br />be discovered. <br /> <br />Twin Lake. Clear Creek. Mt. Elbert Forebav Area - The Mt. Elbert <br />Forebay. Twin Lakes, Clear Creek Area is in an area of glacial <br />moraine and the Dry Union formation. Placer gold is present in <br />these two geologic units but in such minute quantities as to be <br />economically unretrievable. Proof of this lies in the hundreds <br />of samples from many types of test holes. taken from these <br />three areas during preconstruction subsurface investigations. <br />Detailed megascopic logs of all the samples have revealed no <br />gold or other preciOUS metals. (Shirley. 1971; Tuttle, 1975 <br />[in preparation]; Bureau of Reclamation, 1969) <br /> <br />Granite bedrock is estimated to be at .a depth of at least 1,000 <br />feet and could be as much as 3,000 feet below the forebay site. <br />The depth of the unconsolidated sediments above the bedrock <br />precludes the development of base and precious metal deposits. <br />Also the fact that the area lies out of the Paleozoic sediments, <br />makes the chances of finding any valuable minerals in the <br />granite almost nil. <br /> <br />Placer mining for gold and possibly other heavy metals has taken <br />place in the general vicinity of the forebay site. Two operations <br />were halted several years ago when they became economically <br />infeasible. Both were marginal operations at best. Most of this <br />activity took place on Box Creek, lying to the north of the <br />Me. Elbe~t Forebav site, and some occurred on Lake Creek below <br />the existing Twin Lakes Dam. The r~c~utly P~S$ed law which once <br />again allows U.S. citizens to own gold and sell it on the world <br />market may allow for reactivating these two placer mines, provided <br />sufficient capital can be raised. Even with reactivation, <br />Mt. Elbert Forebay will not conflict with any future operations <br />on these two sites because of its geographic and geologic location <br />in relation to the two placer mines. <br /> <br />.1 <br /> <br />Several placer claims exist in the area of the Twin Lakes and <br />forebay reservoir sites. One claim was declared null and void <br />in 1974 because no valuable mineral deposit was discovered <br />within the limits of the claim. During the hearings on the <br />above case it was admitted that "spot" samples resulted in low <br />assay values (less than 0.05 milligram). It was maintained, <br />however, that a man of ordinary prudence would not be justified <br />in the expenditure of time and money with a reasonable prospect <br /> <br />III-23 <br /> <br />. <br />