My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07460
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07460
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:27:26 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:24:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.400
Description
Title I - Mexican Treaty
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
2/1/1963
Author
USDOI/BOR
Title
Special Studies - Delivery of Water to Mexico
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.', <br /> <br />San Luis, Arizona, and in the Limitrophe <br />Division of the Colorado River (that section <br />of the Colorado River between the <br />Northerly and Southerly International <br />Boundaries). The salinity of this delivery <br />would be substantially the same as the <br />waters customarily delivered there. <br /> <br />r. <br /> <br />. The United States would build a Bypass <br />Drain extending the MODE to carry the <br />YDP reject stream and bypassed irrigation <br />drainage to the Southerly International <br />Boundary and pay Merico to build an <br />additional extension through Merico to the <br />Santa Clara Slough, upstream from the <br />Gulf of California. (See frontispiece map.) <br /> <br />. The United States and Merico would limit <br />ground-water pumping within 5 miles on <br />each side of the Southerly International <br />Land Boundary near San Luis to <br />160,000 aere-feet annually. <br /> <br />. The United States and Merico would <br />consult each other before developing <br />surface- or ground-water resources in the <br />border area that might adversely affect <br />the other country, <br /> <br />. Measures required to implement this <br />resolution would be undertaken and <br />completed as soon as practicable, and the <br />United States would sesk prompt funding <br />for construction of the works needed to <br />fulfill the agreement, <br /> <br />Title I Provisions <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Public Law 93-320 was passed on June 24, <br />1974, to enable the United States to comply <br />with its obligations under Minute No, 242 <br />without depriving the Basin States of any of <br />their apportioned water (Title I program) <br />and to authorize projects to control the <br />salinity of the water delivered to users in <br />the United States (Title II program), <br /> <br />Section 101(bXI) of Public Law 93-320 <br />authorized (I) construction, operation, and <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Title I History and Provisions <br /> <br />maintenance of a desalting plant to remove <br />salts from WMIDD irrigation drainage; <br />(2) construction of the necessary ap- <br />purtenant works; (3) construction of the <br />Bypass Drain from Morelos Dam to the <br />Santa Clara Slough to dispose of reject <br />stream from the desalting plant and other <br />bypassed water; (4) replacement of the <br />metal flume in the existing MODE with a <br />concrete siphon; (5) reduction ofWMIDD <br />irrigation drainage by improving irrigation <br />efficiencies and acquiring irrigation district <br />lands; (6) acquisition oflands in Painted <br />Rock Reservoir, as necessary, for flood <br />control (the Painted Rock Reservoir land <br />acquisition program was not completed <br />because the United States determined that <br />sufficient storage capacity exists to operate <br />the reservoir in accordance with its <br />obligations under Minute No, 242); and <br />(7) construction, operation, and main- <br />tenance of all associated facilities including <br />roads, railroad spur, and transmission lines. <br /> <br />Section 101(bX2) specified the initial plant <br />characteristics and stated that "the power <br />supply for the desalting complex will not <br />diminish the supply of power to preference <br />customers from the Federal power systems <br />operated by the Secretary," and that "all <br />costs associated with the desalting complex <br />shall be nonreimbursable except as provided <br />in sections 101(fXI) and 101(h)," <br /> <br />Section 102(a) authorized concrete lining of <br />the first 49 miles of the Coachella Canal of <br />the Boulder Canyon Project, California. For <br />an interim period, the United States has <br />use of an amount of water equal to that <br />conserved by lining the canal (about <br />132,000 acre-feet per year), The conserved <br />water provides a source of replacement <br />water for WMIDD irrigation drainage <br />bypassed to meet the salinity differentia}, <br /> <br />Also, as defined in section 102(a), the <br />interim period of use began when canal <br />lining was completed in 1982 and <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.