My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07376
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07376
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:27:00 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:18:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.100
Description
Title I - Yuma Desalting Plant
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
8/1/1988
Author
USDOI/BOR
Title
Operation and Maintenance Funding for the Yuma Desalting Plant, Draft Special Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />~;- <br />, SOO? <br />IUmfITAL ~ ro ~ O&M ams CF U;, ~tF f <br /> <br />Because of the escalation of power costs in recent years the Yuma Projects <br /> <br />Office of Reclamation has been analyzing m:x:Iifications to the desalting <br /> <br /> <br />plant to reduce the anticipated O&M costs. This effort was expanded and a <br /> <br />planning team was fomed during 1986 and chal:ged with reevaluating the <br /> <br />desalting plant operations and identifying any structural or nonstructural <br /> <br />plans with the potential of reducing YDP operating costs. <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />The Reclamation plarming team identified 48 plans for m:x:Iifying the <br /> <br />operation of the desalting plant to reduce operation and maintenance costs. <br /> <br />This report provides a representative sanple of the type of alternatives <br /> <br />examined by the planning team. The Lower Colorado Region is continuing to <br /> <br />work with the Basin states on potential nethods to reduce costs of <br /> <br />operating the YDP and on alternatives to develop a source of reject stream <br /> <br />replace.""",L water that would be acceptable to the Basin states. The <br /> <br />alternatives presented in this report fall into boo categories--six in <br /> <br />Category A and nine in Category B: <br /> <br />Category A contains exanples of those alternatives examined by the <br /> <br />Planning Team which m:x:Iify operations of the YDP to reduce costs or <br /> <br />identify alternative (less costly) power sources for YDP. (Power costs are <br />approximately 25 percent of the total O&M cost.) <br /> <br />Category B contains exanples of those altematives examined by the <br /> <br />Planning Team that would develop alternative sources of water to replace <br /> <br />the reject stream or which reduce the required plant operating tine or <br />capacity. <br /> <br />O[l')n ,~~:j r!, <br />,1 g. fj~ ~ ~ ,>; ,: " ;, <br />~ '.... "... j,' ' <br />S t~ ~i:~'~: '<?"~: <br />'n Jl) .... .i <br />1\, ....,.. , <br />( ,'~ .: :'.' ~ iJ <br />. - r~..JJ!:.. ~':w j <br /> <br />. r' \. <br />," .. ~ <br />'-~:" ~-( . <br />.::: ~,;."d '~ <br /> <br />" '\ ~"',' ~,' ',,::- <br />7;:(~;~ - .. <br />:1': '!9 .>"i> :)' <br />~ "."j ~ :.:......... ';." <br /> <br />1" '-1" iH <br />" ," ,I J <br />'\ " " \ ~-~ <br />..J; ~ \.:: ~' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.