Laserfiche WebLink
<br />001102 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4. The proposed settlement offer of Denver and Colorado Springs does not <br /> <br />adve:'sely effect the District's replacement ability at Green Mountain <br /> <br />Reservoir so long as replacements for future development on the Western <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Slope are limited to that portion of the 52,000 acre-feet not required <br />by rights vested as of June, 1937 and to the use of the 100,000 acre- <br />feet as referred to in Article 5 (c) of Senate Document No. 80. Thus <br /> <br />limi'~ed, no replacement calls could be made against diversion at Adams <br /> <br />Tun::cl or f01' storage releases from Granby Reservoir. <br /> <br />~ <br />~. The proposed settlement offer of the City of Englewood, through diver- <br /> <br />sio~s under certain conceivable conditions, might create a slight <br /> <br />incr8ase in the quantity of replacement release required from Green <br /> <br />Moun~;ai'l Reservoir. It is estimated that such quantities Hould range <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />froC! 500 to 1000 acre-feet annually. Negotiation with Englewood has <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />alrc~dy been suggested in this report if, in the judgement of the Board <br /> <br />of Directors, the replacement quantities sho~1ll by a current stuQy of <br /> <br />Mr. ~ipton's appear to justify such action. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br />Engineer <br /> <br />. <br />9 <br />