Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I . " .- <br />j, '-1 j --J <br />REGIONAL WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT <br /> <br />f. <br />~ <br />, <br /> <br />Regional Planning <br />The Board continued its support of plan- <br />ning efforts, investigations, conferences, and <br />negotiations that may lead to augmentation <br />of the Colorado River. Board members and <br />staff participated in and reviewed activities <br />of the Western States Water Council, Na- <br />tional Water Commission, and Water Re- <br />sources Council in order to keep apprised of <br />the latest policy developments in the water <br />resources field. The present emphasis on the <br />multiple-objective approach in water re- <br />sources planning has an important impact on <br />Board activities. <br /> <br />Western States Water Council. The <br />Western States Water Council was created <br />by resolutions of the Western Governor's <br />Conference in 1964 and 1965 to accomplish <br />effective cooperation among the western <br />states in planning for programs leading to <br />integrated developments by state, federal, <br />and other agencies of their water resources. <br />California's Council delegates during 1970 <br />were William R. Gianelli, Director of Water <br />Resources, as Chairman; Gordon Cologne, <br />State Senator, 36th District; and Theodore J, <br />George, Marysville Civil Engineer. Myron <br />B. Holburt, Chief Engineer of the Colorado <br />River Board, and Wayne MacRostie of the <br />Department of Water Resources, served as <br />technical advisors to the California delega- <br />tion. <br />During the year, the Council (1) presented <br />a statement to the National Water Commis- <br />sion containing suggestions on the directions <br />that the Commission's studies should take, <br />(2) developed policies and positions relating <br />to the Western U. S, Water Plan Studies, (3) <br />opposed the proposed legislation creating an <br />Indian Trust Counsel Authority, and (4) <br />took miscellaneous actions relating to the <br />federal "Reservation Doctrine" in western <br />water law, federal water pollution legisla- <br />tion, and amendments to the federal 160-acre <br />limitation, <br /> <br />Of particular interest are the Council's <br />comments, submitted to Commissioner Arm- <br />strong on the Bureau of Reclamation's July <br />1970 draft of a plan of study for the Western <br />U. S. Water Plan Study. The comments are <br />summarized as follows: <br /> <br />1. The proposed study is too broad in its scope, appar- <br />ently suggesting an expansion of ongoing Type 1 <br />Studies authorized by the Water Resources Plan- <br />ning Act of 1965. <br />2. A single entity should be responsible for the study, <br />control all funds, and delegate specific assign- <br />ments. <br />3. Procedures and methods to be used in making pro- <br />jections should be more clearly stated. <br />4. Provisions should be made to allow state participa- <br />tion at the policy and decision making levels of the <br />study rather than limiting state participation to the <br />Bureau of Reclamation's Denver management of- <br />fice. <br />5. Economic evaluation under existing laws and poli- <br />cies and environmental quality should receive <br />greater emphasis. <br /> <br />National Water Commission. The <br />National Water Commission was created <br />by P,L. 90-515, enacted in September 1968, <br />to make a five-year study and recommen- <br />dations to the President and the Congress <br />on the nation's water needs, resources, and <br />problems, Formation of the Commission <br />was initially discussed in connection with <br />the Colorado River Basin Project legisla- <br />tion of 1968. The Commission is composed <br />of seven members who are appointed by <br />and serve at the pleasure of the President <br />of the United States. During 1970, mem- <br />bers Samuel S. Baxter and Clyde T. Ellis <br />resigned and were replaced by James R. <br />Ellis and James C. Murphy. The perma- <br />nent staff almost doubled during the year, <br />increasing from 21 to 41. The full person- <br />nel complement is 44. <br />During the first years of its existence, <br />the Commission held national and re- <br />gional conferences for the purpose of re- <br />ceiving the reactions and hearing the re- <br />quirements of water resources officials <br /> <br />33 <br />