My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07317
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07317
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:26:46 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:15:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.140.20
Description
Colorado River Basin Organizations and Entities - Colorado River Basin States Forum - California
State
CA
Basin
Western Slope
Date
1/1/1971
Author
Myron B Holburt
Title
Annual Report for the Calendar Year 1970
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />l<lce; <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />operation of Minute No. 218, the required <br />makeup from storage has cost users in the <br />United States a total of 201,100 acre-feet, an <br />average of 40,200 acre-feet per year. The an- <br />nual average salinity of Colorado River water <br />delivered to Mexico under the Treaty at the <br />Northerly International Boundary decreased <br />from 1,330 to 1,278 parts per million (ppm) <br />during the five-year period. <br />During the fifth year of Minute No. 218 <br />operation, the daily average salinity of the <br />deliveries to Mexico at the Northerly Inter- <br />national Boundary varied from about 1,000 <br />ppm to 1,450 ppm. The aVerage salinity of the <br />Wellton-Mohawk drainage waters in 1970 <br />was estimated at 3,790 ppm, which is about <br />340 ppm less than that of 1969. Plate 8 shows <br />the salinity and flow of the Wellton-Mohawk <br />Outfall Drain, the Colorado River at Impe- <br />rial Dam, and at the Northerly International <br />Boundary with Mexico. <br />Mexico has also been working on facilities <br />to reduce the impact of the river's salinity on <br />its lands. An $18,000,000 canal rehabilitation <br />project in Mexicali Valley, initiated in June <br />1969, was aoout IS percent complete at the <br />end of 1970. This work consists principally of <br />concrete lining of the Valley's canal system. <br />By reducing seepage losses and phreatophyte <br />consumption, this project will increase the <br />ability of Mexican irrigators to cope with <br />high salinity water. <br />Construction work on 12 new drainage <br />wells on the Yuma Mesa and on a conveyance <br />conduit was completed during 1970 by the <br />Bureau of Reclamation. The conduit dis- <br />charges water pumped from the Yuma area <br />ground water basin into the Colorado River <br />at a point about 6 miles upstream from More- <br />los Dam. <br />The U. S. Geological Survey completed <br />analog model studies and a report on the <br />Yuma area ground water basin and presented <br />the results to Mexican engineers in February <br />1970. The model demonstrated that under- <br />ground water in the Yuma area primarily <br />originates as deep percolation from irriga- <br />tion of lands in the United States and not <br />from the river's mainstem; and that the effect <br /> <br />of pumping the 12 Yuma Mesa wells on the <br />flow of ground water to Mexico would be <br />insignificant. <br /> <br />Establishment of Water Quality Standards <br />The setting of numerical salinity criteria <br />for the Colorado River has been postponed <br />by the Colorado River Basin states with the <br />concurrence of the Secretary of the Interior <br />until sufficient information IS available to as- <br />sure that salinity standards will be workable. <br />The basin states have all adopted their indi- <br />vidual version of an "anti-degradation state- <br />ment" which declares that, subject to certain <br />exceptions, each state Of poses the further <br />degradation of its natura waterways. <br />On June 4,1970, the State Water Resources <br />Control Board (SWRCB) adopted bacterio- <br />logical quality criteria for the Colorado Riv- <br />er. The SWRCB also considered radiological <br />and temperature objectives during 1970, <br />postponed further action on the former <br />pending additional research, and held several <br />hearings in attempting to adopt acceptable <br />temperature objectives. The problem is to set <br />forth policies that would provide the desired <br />degree of control of thermal wastes and at the <br />same time permit the return of agricultural <br />drainage water to the Colorado River. <br />On April 16, 1970, the State Water Re- <br />sources Control Board held a public hearing <br />on temperature objectives for all existing <br />California water quality control policies. For <br />the Colorado River, the proposed objectives <br />provided that a 5' F rise above background <br />temperature would be permitted for the <br />months of October through March, and a 2. <br />F rise for the remainder of the year. The <br />Chief Engineer of the Colorado River Board <br />presented a statement at the public hearings <br />which pointed out that irrigation water users <br />have no means by which return flows can be <br />controlled and recommended that numerical <br />temperature limits not be set that could pre- <br />vent irrigation districts along the Colorado <br />River from beneficially using their water. <br />Additional recommendations were also made <br />to clarify certain terms and to limit individ- <br />ual discharges of industrial water to a max- <br />imum temperature. The State Department of <br />Fish and Game proposed a modification to <br />the proposed objectives concerning warm <br />water fisheries which was supported by the <br /> <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.