Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />annual waste to the Gulf of California. Storage of water on the <br />Colorado River system would not establish a priority water right, and <br />therefore shall not preclude or interfere with water development, as it <br />becomes feasible. <br /> <br />Mr. Emerson: <br />(looking at Norviel) <br />As I understand it, Mr. Norviel's form of pact proposes no <br />definite allocation between states. Without some definitive allocation <br />strategy, from the Wyoming standpoint, I can't conceive that we could <br />sign any such agreement. <br /> <br />Mr. Norviel: <br />As to the division of the basin into two divisions, it isn't, as I <br />conceive it, what we were appointed for. It doesn't arrive at any <br />conclusion, and, as it is stated, it leaves the states of the two <br />divisions to work out their own salvation on whatever plan they may <br />choose in the future. <br /> <br />Mr. Emerson: <br />(appealing to Norviel to do what can be done for an allocation between the <br />Upper and Lower states) <br />Mr. Norviel, it seems to me, the success of this endeavor <br />depends upon whether we can solve the problem we have in hand <br />now. If you look at this thing in a big way; it is a conflict between the <br />states of the lower river and the states in the upper river. If we can <br />solve that conflict - why that is the biggest thing we can do. <br /> <br />Mr. Norviel: <br />(offended at suggestion he hasn't proposed a viable solution) <br />If you will read carefully the suggestion I make, I think you will <br />find there is a solution there as clear as a clear sky. <br /> <br />Mr. Stephen B. Davis: <br />(challenging Norviel face to face) <br /> <br />21 <br />