Laserfiche WebLink
<br />78 <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER: Then we oome to paragro.ph(c), liThe provisions <br />Df this article sho.ll not apply to, or interfere with the regu- <br />lo.tion o.nd control of the approprio.tion, use and distribution of <br />w.o.ter by, any state within its limits.1I <br />MR. Cl,RPENTER: The previous paragraphs imply only interstate <br />relations and this provision limits the others to intersto.te <br />relations. <br /> <br />MR. EMERSON: Isn't it intrasto.te, rather than interstate? <br />MR. HOOVER: In other words; I just wanted to be sUre whether <br />it did make the rest wholly interstate; o.nd whether or not one <br />sto.te will decide who.t it's going to do if it poesn't upset the <br />rest of them. <br />MR. NORVIEL: Refers to the whole basin, the fil'st two <br />sections. I don't see any necessity for (0) a~ all. <br />I think that paragraph i~ a desirable part of <br /> <br /> MR. SCRUGHl>.M : <br />the compact. <br /> MR. HOOVER: <br />it's material. <br /> MR. MC CLURE: <br /> MR. SCRUGHbM : <br />; MR. EMERSON: <br /> MR. NORVIEL: <br /> <br />:~ <br /> <br />Let's see how we stand, on it? I don't ,think <br /> <br />I think it isn't impQrtant; aye., <br />MR. Cl,RPENTER: MR. DiNIS: . MR. CJ,LDWELL: <br />l.ye. <br />Just a word right here: IIUse and distribution <br /> <br />of water ,by any statell. What does 'by any sto.te' mean? <br />MR. HOOVER: Within the iimits of any state. -- The last <br />time we said that wasn't neoessary. I think Mr. Noryiel made a <br />point; it looks like states use - what is meant is within 0. state <br />and should be "within the limits of any state." <br />MR. ChRPENTER: If I were writing it for a lawyer I would <br />