Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br /> <br />77 <br />MR. SCRUGHf;M: Not the milling of ores. Milling is an entirely <br /> <br />separate process from mining. h dependable water supply is required <br />for milling. <br />MR. ChRPENTER: Why not say the words 'municipal, mining and <br />milling.' <br />MR. NORVIEL: I think the word 'industrial' would cover that. <br />MR. ChRPENTER: I would rather have that. <br />MR. HOOVER: I am not sure but that Mr. Norviel hasn't some- <br />thing that will be helpful. I think we might as well take in the <br />other industries. <br />MR. NORVIEL: This would not include a water mill for grinding <br />corn - industrial would use all. <br />MR. EMERSON: Would 'industrial' cover it? <br />MR. SCRUGH1,M: I favor the term 'mining, MilJ.,ing and other <br />industries'. I want to conform tp the language of our state <br />statutes. <br />MR. EMERSON: Industrial, will take the place of manuTacturing <br />and so it will materially lessen the expression. <br />MR. HOOVER: In the previous paragraph this shows the <br />notation of the s'ame idea, so let's say lImining, mi~ling and other <br />industrial uses.lI. Mr. Carpenter's suggestion was -- <br />MR. NORVIEL: 'None of which shall include the generation of <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'" <br /> <br />electrio power. <br />MR. HOOVER: IIMunicipal, mining and milling and :i;ndustrial <br />uses shall not be taken to include the generation of P9wer.1I Is <br /> <br />rt <br /> <br />it satisfactory? <br /> <br />MR. NORVIEL: MR. EMERSONt MR. Cl,RPENTER: MR. SCRTJGH1;M: <br />MR. D1..VIS: Aye. <br />