My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07215
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07215
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:26:18 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:12:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.106.I
Description
Animas La Plata Project
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/1/1996
Author
DOI-BOR
Title
Animas La Plata Project - CO-NM - Final Supplement to the Final Environmental Statement - Volume I
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />111 <br />; I <br />":1 <br /> <br />(i,J22Sn <br /> <br />Summary <br /> <br />Phase II facilities that would be constructed include Southern Ute Dam and Reservoir; <br />Southern Ute Reservoir recreation facilities; La Plata Diversion Dam; the remaining <br />portion of Dry Side Canal, which would be extended to near the Ute Mountain Ute <br />Reservation boundary; New Mexico Irrigation Canal; Alkali Gulch, Ute Mountain, <br />Southern Ute, and Third Terrace Pumping Plants; and the laterals to serve the Phase II <br />lands. <br /> <br />All Project lands would receive a pressurized supply of water sufficient to operate <br />sprinkler systems, with the exception of Project lands above Dry Side Canal, which would <br />receive Project water by exchange. Delivery of M&I water for the Southern Ute Indian <br />Tribe could be at Ridges Basin Reservoir or Southern Ute Reservoir, and for the Ute <br />Mountain Ute Tribe at the end of Dry Side Canal. Delivery of all non-Indian M&I water <br />would be the same as in Phase I, Stage B. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />:1 <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />During Phase II, an average yearly diversion of 136,400 acre-feet would be diverted from <br />the Animas River at Durango Pumping Plant. Project diversions would also occur <br />downstream from Durango Pumping Plant on the Animas River and San Juan Rivers in <br />New Mexico, and on the La Plata River in Colorado, providing the Project water supply <br />of 191,230 acre-feet. Less water is diverted from the Animas River under Phase II at <br />Durango Pumping Plant as a result of diversion and storage facilities within the La Plata <br />River drainage during Phase II. <br /> <br />INDIAN WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT, COST SHARING, <br />AND PROJECT PHASING <br /> <br />Colorado Ute Indian Water Rights Settlement Act of 1988 <br /> <br />The Project plays a critical role in the resolution of the Colorado Ute Indian water rights <br />t:nder the Winters Doctrine'. The Southern Ute Indian and the Ute Mountain Ute Tribes, <br />~eadquartered in Ignacio and Towaoc, Colorado, respectively, have reservation lands <br />within the Animas and La Plata Rivers drainages, as well as in drainage basins of other <br />streams tributary to the San Juan River. The Colorado Ute Indian reservations were <br />created in 1868 and, as such, the Tribes have a priority date for their water rights that <br />precedes the priority dates for most, if not all, of the non-Indian water rights. <br /> <br />I <br />!I <br />'I <br />.'1 <br />I, <br />I <br /> <br />The State of Colorado has estimated the potential effect of outstanding Indian claims on <br />non-Indian water rights and predicted that all non-Indian irrigation in the Mancos and <br />La Plata River drainages could be eliminated if Colorado Ute Tribal water rights claims <br />were fully exercised (Lile, 1990). During dry years, the Tribes would exercise senior <br />water rights to virtually all available water on numerous rivers and streams in the <br />San Juan River Basin. It was estimated that more than 34,000 acres of land irrigated by <br />non-Indians could be adversely impacted if a settlement of Tribal water rights claims was <br />not achieved. <br /> <br />] The Winters or reserved water rights doctrine was established in Winters v. United States, 207 U.S. 564 <br />(1908), and provides that the establishment of an Indian reservation impliedly reserves the amount of water <br />necessary for the purposes of the reservation. <br /> <br />5-8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.