Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />0851 <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />and personnel become available for that purpose. In the detailed stud- <br />ies alternative plans of development will be further considered, particu- <br />larly possibilities of expanding the Basalt project to include irriga- <br />tion service to lands in the Thompson Creek, Three Mile Creek, and Four <br />Mile Creek areas and of expanding the Bluestone project to include addi- <br />tional water for lands in the Bluestone Ditch and Parachute Creek areas. <br /> <br />lihile the Basalt and Bluestone projects appear to present the most <br />favorable potentialities for the use of Ruedi Reservoir water on the <br />western slope, studies of these projects are not meant to preclude con- <br />sideration of other possibilities for utilizing the water. Some western <br />slope storage needs will be supplied for the existing Gree~ Mountain <br />Reservoir of the Colorado-Big Thompson project by agreements to be made <br />under the provisions of Sp.nate Document No. 80, 75th Congress, 1937. <br />The ultimate assignment of Ruedi and Green Mountain Reservoir water to <br />western slope projects will require an extensive coordination of water <br />uses and water rights that is beyond the scope of the present studies. <br /> <br />Only project effects on irrigation are appraised in the accompanying <br />report on the Basalt project and on~Y effects on irrieation and power <br />in the report on the Bluestone project. Effects in other fields such as <br />recreation, fish and wildlife, and flood control will be considered in <br />future studies made in r,reater detail. The Bureau of Sport Fisheries <br />and Wildlife in a memorandum dated February 12, 1963, a copy of which is <br />appended at the end of this volume, discusses aspects of the projects to <br />which th~t agency will give further consideration during the course of <br />future feaSibility stUdies. <br /> <br />Water conservation agencies in Colorado have encouraged the inves- <br />-LigRt.inn" ,.~rered by--tb4.-s-report-and-have been musL I!<,lpful III Lh" >" u",,- <br />cution of the work. The Colorado Water Conservation Board contributed <br />$15,OOO to the Bureau of Reclamation in order to have studies started in <br />Fiscal Year 1961. The board also contributed funds to the U. S. Geologi- <br />cal Survey for the installation of three gaging stations on potential <br />project streams. The Colorado River Water Conservation District assisted <br />in the investigations and made water filings required for the projects. <br />The district also obtained advance topographic sheets of project areas <br />from the U. S. Geological Survey which were useful in project studies. <br /> <br />4 <br />