My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07117
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07117
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:25:49 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:06:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.130
Description
Grand Valley Unit-Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
11/1/1990
Title
Final Environmental Assessment: Price and Stubb Ditch Improvements - Grand Valley Unit
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />....... <br />OJ <br />~ <br />o <br />'_J <br />':::> <br /> <br />Chapter II I <br /> <br />AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND <br />ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES <br /> <br />Threatened and Endanaered Species <br /> <br />Present Conditions <br /> <br />The endangered Colorado squawfish and humpback chub, and the razorback <br />sucker, which is proposed for listing, have been documented in the Colorado <br />River in the Grand Valley. This reach of river supports all life stages <br />(Fish and Wildlife Service, 1982). The Service has documented spawning <br />aggregations of radio-tagged Colorado squawfish in the Colorado River <br />between Palisade and Grand Junction, and larval and young-of-the-year <br />squawfish have been collected from this reach. Additional information can <br />be found in Kaeding and Osmundson (1989). The Colorado squawfish is <br />currently restricted to 25 percent of its historic range. <br /> <br />Field and literature studies indicate that no threatened or endangered <br />plants occur within the Grand Valley Unit impact area. The endangered <br />Uinta Basin hookless cactus is found in desert lands south of the valley, <br />but has not been found in irrigated areas. <br /> <br />The endangered whooping crane migrates through the study area. Theses <br />cranes are part of an experimental flock that migrate in association with <br />sandhill cranes. There are at least two active peregrine falcon nests in <br />the nearby Bookcliffs. Hunting habitat for these birds may include the <br />Grand Valley area, the Colorado River corridor, and lands to the north of <br />the Bookcliffs. The bald eagle is a winter resident in the valley using <br />large cottonwood trees along the river and in the valley for roosting. <br />Food sources include carrion, waterfowl and fish. <br /> <br />Potential habitat for the endangered black-footed ferret exists in the <br />desert lands surrounding the irrigated portion of the valley. This species <br />is not known to exist in the area. <br /> <br />ImDacts <br /> <br />Under the future-without project conditions, the status of endangered <br />species using the area should not change. Areas along the Colorado River <br />used by bald eagles may continue to deteriorate as habitat losses due to <br />developments and increased human recreation occur, and eventually, the <br />number of bald eagles wintering in the area may decline. Peregrine falcons <br />may increase in numbers if future State and Federal management programs are <br />successful. The whooping cranes in the experimental flock are not <br />reproducing and, therefore, may disappear. The threatened and endangered <br />Colorado fishes may recover in numbers; however, this cannot be predicted <br />at this time. <br /> <br />Proposed construction activities along the Price and stubb Ditches would <br />not adversely affect the Colorado squawfish, humpback chub, and razorback <br />sucker. Construction would occur during the winter when the ditches are <br />dry, thus there should be no increases in turbidity downstream. The <br />proposed project would annually reduce salt-loading contributions from the <br />Price and Stubb Ditches by some 7,200, and 4,300 tons, respectively. <br />However, the endangered fishes of the Colorado River exhibit a wide range <br />of tolerance and would probably not benefit from or be adversely effected <br />by these reductions in salinity within the river. <br /> <br />The proposed changes to the ditches would reduce seepage from the ditches <br />and consequently, more water should remain in the irrigation systems than <br />has historically. This water is commonly called "salvaged" or "saved" <br /> <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.