My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07117
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07117
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:25:49 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:06:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.130
Description
Grand Valley Unit-Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
11/1/1990
Title
Final Environmental Assessment: Price and Stubb Ditch Improvements - Grand Valley Unit
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />o <br /> <br />-, <br />,_~ J <br /> <br />...... <br />o <br /> <br />:-") <br /> <br />~~) <br /> <br />Chapter I II <br /> <br />AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND <br />ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES <br /> <br />Imoacts <br /> <br />Future conditions without the proposed project are expected to follow <br />current trends. Residential development should continue, but at a slower <br />pace than experienced in the early 1980's. This would mean more people in <br />the immediate area of both ditches. Some of these people may not <br />appreciate the natural conditions along the Stubb Ditch and pressure the <br />irrigation district for increased weed control. <br /> <br />The proposed project would alter the appearance, and therefore the <br />esthetics, of both the Price and Stubb Ditches. Segments of the Price <br />Ditch to be lined would assume the appearance of a well groomed and managed <br />conveyance system similar to the ditch's currently lined segments. The <br />appearance of the Stubb Ditch would change dramatically with its conversion <br />from an open ditch to a buried pipeline. Under the proposed plan, the <br />existing Stubb Ditch would be filled and only a maintenance road would <br />remain to mark the pipeline's location. <br /> <br />Initial construction and subsequent termination of water seeping from the <br />ditches would eliminate existing vegetation associated with the Price and <br />Stubb Ditches. Excavation would create piles of raw soil and remove <br />vegetation within ditch rights-of-ways and realignment corridors. Soil <br />piles would be recontoured to serve the needs of the conveyance system, but <br />the cottonwoods and other vegetation currently associated with the ditches <br />would not be replaced. Approximately 75 percent of cottonwood trees <br />growing in canal rights-of-way were removed during construction of Stage <br />One (Colorado Division of Wildlife, 1984). Special construction measures <br />should reduce this loss along the Stubb and Price Ditches. Individual <br />trees have been designated for protection in the construction <br />specifications. Many plant species such as cottonwoods and willows that <br />are dependant upon water from the leaking ditches, would probably not <br />replace themselves. Loss of the diverse vegetation associated with the <br />Price and Stubb Ditches would have an adverse impact to the esthetics of <br />the immediate area. <br /> <br />There are plans to revegetate maintenance road banks and other project <br />features. The soil disturbed during construction may cause limited <br />problems from blowing dust or muddy streets during winter construction <br />periods. The disturbed soil remaining from construction activities would <br />provide an ideal seed bed for various annual plants which may be offensive <br />to adjacent landowners. Invading plants on disturbed sites would probably <br />include kochia, cheatgrass, and knapweed. Planned reseeding with desirable <br />species would reduce but not eliminate this problem. This self <br />establishing vegetation would require regular mowing, spraying, or burning <br />to prevent it from becoming a nuisance to adjacent landowners. <br /> <br />Construction of the proposed project would cause temporary disruptions <br />along the rights-of-way on both the Price and Stubb Ditches which would <br />affect individuals' access to their property as well as its aesthetic <br />value. Disruption is most significant when these effects occur to homes or <br />businesses. If both disruption of esthetics and access exceed what is <br />acceptable, possible conflict could occur among property owners, the <br />contractor, and Reclamation. Therefore, construction provisions would <br />require the contractor to provide access to personal property and would <br />limit the contractors work activities to daylight hours in residential <br />areas. <br /> <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.