Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />00 <br />.-t <br />o <br />:-) <br /> <br />.,~ <br />'-' <br /> <br />Chapter II I <br /> <br />AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND <br />ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES <br /> <br />General Impacts <br /> <br />Future conditions without the proposed project should follow current <br />trends. Some irrigated cropland would continue to be converted to <br />residential development, while acres in orchards would cycle, but remain <br />fairly stable. The ditches would continue to provide some aesthetic <br />diversity to the area, and unauthorized recreational use of ditch rights- <br />of-ways would continue and perhaps increase with increasing human <br />population growth. <br /> <br />The proposed project would complete the lining of the 9.1-mile-long Price <br />Ditch and replace the 10.2 miles of the Stubb Ditch with a buried pipeline. <br />During construction, local residents would be impacted by noise and dust, <br />and the inconveniences of travel delays and detours. Vegetation within the <br />ditch rights-of-ways would be lost during construction. Following <br />construction, plants dependent upon water seeping from the ditches would <br />not replace themselves. <br /> <br />Water Supply <br /> <br />Stream Flows and Water Riohts <br /> <br />The proposed changes to the ditches would reduce seepage from the ditches <br />and consequently, more water should remain in the irrigation systems than <br />has historically. This water is commonly called "salvaged" or "saved" <br />water and is estimated at 1,615 acre-feet per year. The districts have <br />agreed not to use this saved water in a manner which would materially <br />increase the salinity contribution to the Colorado River. Beyond that <br />requirement Colorado State water law would determine the destiny of the <br />salvaged water. It is anticipated that if the districts can continue to <br />show beneficial use of all diverted water, no change in water rights would <br />occur. Since both districts are essentially land locked, the likelihood of <br />increasing their service areas is small. <br /> <br />Studies conducted by Reclamation have indicated that the supply of water to <br />both ditches is significantly less than other ditches in the valley based <br />upon design standards. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that their <br />peak diversion rate will not decrease and beneficial use of the Districts' <br />full water rights will be maintained. <br /> <br />Aoricultural Practices <br /> <br />Present Conditions <br /> <br />Agriculture has been an important industry in the Unit area since the first <br />settlers began irrigating in the 1880's. Principal cash crops include <br />fruit (apples, peaches, pears, apricots, and cherries), vineyards, corn, <br />barley, and other grains. Alfalfa and corn ensilage are the main forage <br />crops. <br /> <br />Because of the low precipitation in the valley, irrigation is essential for <br />agriculture. Irrigation water is diverted from the Colorado River into <br />major canals that feed smaller laterals. Smaller on-farm ditches then <br /> <br />18 <br />