Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />r- <br />..-4 <br />o <br />'::J <br />.~ <br /> <br />CHAPTER II <br /> <br />DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />Relocation of Property <br /> <br />Price and Stubb Ditch Imorovements.--No major relocation would be required <br />for improvement of the Price and Stubb Ditches. Precautions would be taken <br />during construction to minimize disturbance of existing utilities and <br />watercourses. If necessary, bridges as well as road crossings would be <br />replaced; however, roadways across the canal would remain passable during <br />the construction period. Any fences removed for construction purposes <br />would be restored. <br /> <br />East End Government Hiohline Canal Crass-Drainaae Facilities.--Relocation <br />of a portion of a county road north of I-70 for construction of the <br />detention ditch would no longer be required. <br /> <br />Estimated Costs <br /> <br />Price and Stubb Ditch Imorovements.--Construction costs for the <br />plan are estimated at $10,070,000 based on October 1990 prices. <br />estimated OM&R shows that an annual savings of $14,100 per year <br />result from the canal improvements. The annual cost per ton of <br />removed is estimated to be $53. <br /> <br />recommended <br />The <br />would <br />salt <br /> <br />East End Government Hiahline Canal Cross-Drainaae.--Deleting construction <br />of these facilities would reduce the costs of the FEIS recommended plan by <br />about $4,200,000. <br /> <br />No-Action Alternative <br /> <br />Price and stubb Ditch Improvements <br /> <br />The no-action alternative, developed by inventorying current conditions and <br />projecting anticipated changes, would consist of not making modifications <br />to the Price and Stubb Ditches for salinity control. The present condition <br />of the irrigation systems would be maintained by the water user <br />organizations. Salt loading from these two conveyances would continue at <br />or near the present levels. <br /> <br />East End Government Hiahline Canal Cross-Drainaae <br /> <br />The facilities in the FEIS recommended plan would be constructed. The <br />impacts of these facilities were discussed in the FEIS. <br /> <br />System Combination Alternative (Nan-Viable) <br /> <br />Plan Concepts and Estimated Accomplishments <br /> <br />This alternative only addresses the improvement alternatives for the Price <br />and Stubb Ditches and does not address any alternatives for the East End <br />Government Highline Canal cross-drainage facilities. <br /> <br />11 <br />