Laserfiche WebLink
<br />co <br />c..D <br />.... <br />o <br />':") <br />c:> <br /> <br />CHAPTER II <br />DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />Recommended Plan <br /> <br />Plan Conceots and Estimated Accomplishments <br /> <br />The recommended plan would consist of lining or pipe placement on 7.9 miles <br />of the 10-mile-long Stubb Ditch and 6.9 miles of improved lining on the <br />9-mile-long Price Ditch. Measures are included to compensate for wildlife <br />habitat loases that would result from improvement of the ditches. <br />Implementation of the plan would reduce salt loading by about 11,500 tons <br />annually at an estimated cost effectiveness of $53 per ton. <br /> <br />Construction is scheduled over a 3-year period starting in the spring of <br />1991. Construction activities would not interfere with irrigation and <br />would essentially be limited to the non-irrigation season. <br /> <br />Table 1 <br />Estimated accomplishments <br />of the recommended plan <br /> <br /> Total to Incremental <br /> Total be lined Salt cost <br /> length or piped reduction effectiveness <br />Canal system (miles) (miles) (tons/vear) is/ton) <br />Stubb Ditch 10.2 7.9 4,300 $52 <br />Price Ditch ~ ~ 7,200 54 <br />Total 19.3 14.8 11,500 <br /> <br />Overall <br />cost <br />effectiveness <br />IS/tonl <br /> <br />$53 <br /> <br />Plan Features <br /> <br />Price and stubb Ditch Improvements <br /> <br />General.--The canal improvements would consist of lining or piping <br />portions of the Price Ditch. The Stubb Ditch improvements would consist of <br />replacing the open channel with pipe where hydraulic conditions permit. If <br />hydraulic conditions prevent the use of pipe, the ditch would be lined. <br />Further discussion about types of improvements for the Stubb Ditch assume <br />that hydraulic conditions will permit pipe replacement. Major existing <br />structures along the canal, including siphons, flumes, check structures, <br />and bridges, would be evaluated as to their structural and hydraulic <br />soundness and would be replaced if necessary. All turnout structures would <br />be replaced, and new centerline check structures may be added to control <br />the canal water surface elevation. Existing operation and maintenance <br />(O&M) roads would be replaced. <br /> <br />Disturbed lands along the Price and stubb Ditches would be reseeded <br />following construction. Cover type would be selected to minimize O&M along <br />the improved ditches while still providing erosion control and wildlife <br />habitat. <br /> <br />Stubb Ditch.--The design flow for the Stubb Ditch would be <br />approximately 20 cfs. The pipe size would vary from 24 to 42 inches in <br /> <br />5 <br />