Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- 22 - <br /> <br /> <br />0:22C9 <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Eng~neering Investigations <br /> <br />Field investigations to determine structural measure needs <br />were conducted on the two drainages, Fishers Peak and Carbon Arroyos, <br />above the City of Trinidad. These investigations resulted in the <br />selection of two sites, FPC-l and FPC-2, for floodwater-retarding <br />storage. Structure FPC-I is on Fishers Peak Arroyo and FPC-2 is <br />on Carbon Arroyo. A diversion, FPC-I Div., was also determined to <br />be needed in the upper southwest corner of the Fishers Peak drainage <br />to divert floodwater from the upper portion of a small uncontrolled <br />tributary into the floodwater detention area of structure FPC-I, <br />Site locations included consideration of: (1) topography, (2) <br />site conditions, and (3) existing facilities including roads and <br />culverts. An existing closed conduit conveys the runoff from Fishers <br />Peak Arroyo through the City of Trinidad. The conduit was built of <br />rubble masonry, grout, and reinforced concrete-and the floor <br />has poor hydraulic characteristics. The floor will be replaced <br />with new reinforced concrete slab, FPC_l Chan., to insure its margin <br />of operating safety. A reinforced concrete and rock stilling basin <br />will be constructed at the lower end of the closed conduit to <br />stabilize the flow within the conduit and to control erosion <br />downstream. <br /> <br />Detailed topographic maps of the dam sites and pool areas were <br />obtained by planet able surveys on both of the proposed floodwater- <br />retarding structures. Geologic investigations were made and soil <br />samples were taken in the respective borrow areas. <br /> <br />Based on results of soil tests by the Soil Mechanics Laboratory, <br />it was interpreted that a zoned embankment with a core of CL material 11 <br />placed at 90 per cent of modified AASHO would be most feasible. It <br />is believed that 3: I upstream and 2t: 1 downstream slopes would be <br />satisfactory with berms as needed for erosion protection and with <br />drains under the downstream toe. Shear tests will be made on the <br />CL material at 90 per cent of modified and on the GC-GM material <br />before final design. <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />The floodwater-retarding structures are classified as class "c" <br />based on the interpretation of Engineering Memorandum SCS No. 27, <br />revised. Capacity for sediment storage is provided in each structure <br />to contain the estimated sediment accumulation at the sites for the <br />next 50 years. The floodwater-retarding capacity of both structures <br />is based on the runoff of four inches occurring on the wat~rshed <br />less frequently than once in 100 years. A typical structure is <br />shol~ on Figure 3. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />11 Soil type based on Unified Soil Classification System. <br />