Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- 21 - <br /> <br /> <br />0, 1)1);-:8 <br />\,. L,~ lJ <br /> <br />A synthetic series of peak flows' were developed by applying <br />rainfall amounts and frequencies to the runoff characteristics of <br />the watershed. A 24-hour rainfall-frequency curve was computed <br />from U. S. Weather Bureau data at Trinidad. In the Rocky Mountain <br />region practically all recorded maximum annual 24-hour amounts of <br />precipitation result from four to six-hour thunderstorms; therefore, <br />the frequency curve was treated as a six-hour duration curve. No <br />reduction was made for areal distribution because of the small size <br />of the watershed. The composite soil-cover complex numbers were <br />gradually increased with increasing depths of rainfall in order to <br />reflect the greater per cent of runoff that occurs in the more <br />intense rainstorms. <br /> <br />It was agreed by representatives of the Engineering and Water- <br />shed Planning Unit, Lincoln, Nebraska, the Watershed Planning Party, the <br />Colorado State Office of the Soil Conservation Servic~and the Colorado <br />Water Conservation Board, that the deSign flood for detention storage <br />should control approximately four inches of runoff. Four inches of <br />runoff from the 1.14 square miles above the FPC-I dam site, or 243 <br />acre-feet, and 73 acre-feet from 0.34 square mile on FPC-2 will be <br />provided in the reservoirs for flood detention. <br /> <br />Hydraulic characteristics of all channels and structures were <br />determined from field surveys, The channel capacities below the <br />closed conduit on Fishers Peak Arroyo were computed by the Modified <br />Leach's Method for determing water surface profiles. Capacities <br />for the natural stream channels above the Closed conduits on Fishers <br />Peak and Carbon Arroyos were computed by Manning's formula. <br /> <br />Routing for floods of various frequencies through damage reaches <br />was limited to adjustments for travel time only. No reduction was <br />made in the flood peaks because of the short reaches, high velocities, <br />and the small amount of channel storage. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />The emergency spillways for both structures were designed using <br />criteria ip Section 3.21, hydrology handbook, and Engineering <br />Memorandum No. 27, revised. The emergency spillway hydrograph from <br />5.0 inches of rainfall will be regulated to principal spillway discharge <br />without the emergency spillway operating. The freeboard hydrograph <br />(12.5 inches of rainfall in 6 hours) determined the minimum emergency <br />spillway dimensions in structures FPC-l and FPC-2. Since both FPC-l <br />and FPC-2 are class "~' structures, the emergency spillway dimensions <br />were increased beyond the determined minimums. <br />