|
<br />50
<br />
<br />51
<br />
<br />account the rat.es of occurrence. This R.djust..men (.. is accomplished in
<br />part X of this planning report. .. .
<br />Table 10 summarizes and shows the derIVation of capItal. costs,
<br />annual expenses, find annual recreation benefits that are used 1Il sub-
<br />sequen t financial ~"d economic aoalyse,;, ,1 t should be noted ,that the
<br />capitl\l costs and annual expenses do not lIlclud~ n. shure of JOint cost::.
<br />or expeuses which are allocated in part X of thIS report.
<br />
<br />TABLE IO.-lI:lCRlATION COSTS AND BENHlTS
<br />
<br />yielding potential of the irrigable lands has not been attained under
<br />existing ,,,ater supply conditions.
<br />
<br />LAND CLASSIFICATION
<br />
<br />Initial Ultimate Total
<br /> increment
<br />$1,180,000 1 $\, I~O, 000 $2.320,000
<br />62,500 62.500
<br />1. 2~2. 500 1,ltO,000 2,382,500
<br />30,000 60,000 91),000
<br />l~, 400 '30,800 45,200
<br />9.000 9.000
<br />53,400 90, SOD 144,200
<br />340,000 9H1,OOO 1.250,000
<br />
<br />The lnnds were clR.9sified on the basis of their potential productivity
<br />and the est-irnl\ted costs of development, tnking into accounli t.he
<br />composite effects of soil topography, and drn.inage. III estimating the
<br />de\'elopment costs) f\lIowances were made for grading and structures
<br />necessary to fncilitate spreading water efficiently and the iustallR.tions
<br />required to provide fnrm drnillnge. After determining the proJuctivity
<br />ratin.gs and development costs) the lands \\-'ere nssiglled to classes on
<br />the basis of standflrds \".'hich were developed specmca.Uy for lihe
<br />Nnrrows unit by lihe Bureau of Reclamation. The resuJts of the lo.nd
<br />classification are summarized in linble 11. Exhibit 7 shows the locntion
<br />of the lands by classes,
<br />
<br />Ilem
<br />
<br />C.pital cost. 5prcific. .
<br />On....h.lf 01 J.ckson Like rehabilil~lion
<br />
<br />Tolel ~ep~rilble tapllal cosh
<br />
<br />An~ual O.A. & M. __..__________..
<br />~~~~:~It.fal:~::e~ke~-_-...-~:~: . ._._.___.__._ .
<br />Totllspltltlcannu.'axp,nU5__... . _.________._
<br />Annu~1 bene!,ls, unadjusted lor time ot occurrence
<br />
<br />Tola!..
<br />
<br />TABLE" lI-lAND CLASSIFICATlDtl
<br />[Acre~ a~d U5e as 01 ]9561
<br /> Intermillently
<br />CI15S Irriuted Irrlllaledor Tobl
<br /> dr1[a~d
<br /> 62,830 1.325 64,155
<br /> 56,980 10,(\5 67,395
<br /> 2~, 095 ]0,125 3~, 820
<br />----------.. 1~3. 905 U, ~6~ 166,370
<br />27,185 0 27.18~
<br /> 171,090 22, "6~ 193 55~
<br /> 0 105,870 105;870
<br /> 171,090 ]28,335 299,125
<br />
<br />1 Cons"ts of $756,000 field Iilcilily COIl as eslimlled bylhe Nltronll P.lkSer~ice plus $3&4,000 Idded by th. Buteau
<br />ot Rtclamllion tor conli~gencies Ind indIrect costs. .
<br />: Repllcement lor ultimlle increme~1 edded by Bureau ot Reclam.tlon 10 e~llmall by Nallon.1 Park Sar~lce.
<br />
<br />WATER QUALITY CONTROL
<br />The Branch of Water Supply and PoUution Control, Public Health
<br />Service-now tbe Federal Wat.er PolluuQn Control AdlliIrustratlOn,
<br />V,S, Department of the Interinr-made a preliminary study of tbe
<br />need for water quality ,cont,rol below tbe Narrows ~eservOlr, BllSed
<br />on this ,t.udy, the SerVlce recommended that a mllumum flow of 25
<br />cubic feet per second be maintained in the Soutb Platte R,ver from
<br />(,he Narrows Dam to the Colorado-Nebraska State line to assure a
<br />healthful a.quatic environment. NO:nIRI reservoir seepagel. tributary
<br />infl.o'....s, and return flows will prOVide more than tbe desIred flows.
<br />Benetlts or the desired minimum flows were not e.,.aluated; conse-
<br />quently, water quality control is cons~dered to ?e an illcident~1 func-
<br />tion at tbe ull.i t and has not been l1Icluded III cost allocatIOns or
<br />benefit-cost analyses,
<br />
<br />] irrilable___ --..
<br />2Irliiabll_____..
<br />3.rr"lble__ ..
<br />Tolalirriaable
<br />6Wnonirripble.
<br />SubIOl.'
<br />6 nonirrlll~br.. .__
<br />
<br />PUBLIC REA LTH
<br />
<br />The 22,465 acres of intermittently irrigttted, but irrigable, lands
<br />are uuder e:\isting ditch systems !\nd hu\'e been irrigllt.ed wheu water
<br />WitS available. Tbe.y ha\'e been treated us Ilonirrigated land in eco-
<br />nomic u.nd other Bllalyses. The)' would receive tl. consist.eut water
<br />~llp[Jly Irom the Narrow:s ullit but are not considered to be totally
<br />"new" previousl)' non.irrigat,ed IH.nds.
<br />The 27)185 acres of f'11\sS 6\V lands A.re present.ly irrigated but do
<br />not meet the minimum requirements specified by Bureau or Recla-
<br />mat-ion stnnddrJs ror irrign.ble lauds. They will continue La receive
<br />their historic water supply under existing rights but will not partir.i-
<br />pate ill the supplemental ~lIprlie5 provided by tbe ullit.. CIAS~ 6 lands
<br />ure not presently irrig!l.ted and do not meet ilie minimum require-
<br />ments for irrigability.
<br />
<br />The Public He"lth Service, Department of Hewth, Educa~ion, and
<br />Welfare, made n study of disease vector probl~ms m.ld pubh<: health
<br />'hazards in t'he Narrows aren based upon available mformatlOll and
<br />data, The report by the Public Health Service is appended to this
<br />planning report.
<br />All recommendations by tbe Puhlic Health Service are acceptable
<br />to the Bureau of Reclama.t.ion and will be implemented f\S fully as
<br />possible,
<br />
<br />Part VII-PROJECT LANDS
<br />
<br />Class 1
<br />
<br />Thirty.ninc percent, or 64,155 ncres of the net irrigable area is
<br />class 1. The potential productivity or tbe8e lands i~ uniformly high,
<br />und the ue\"e]opmell(, costs are low, ,.he nlnximllm being $30 per acre.
<br />The distinguishing charncterist.ics of the class 1 lands tl.re tueir
<br />deep medium-tpxt,lIred soils Ilnd their neflrly level topography. Within
<br />this class thflre are v>>riations in soil text.ure, the most common type
<br />
<br />DESCRIPTION OF LAND CLASSES
<br />
<br />A semidetailed land classmcntion sunrey using minimum require-
<br />ments for a fully developed n.rea was mnde on approximately 299,425
<br />acres in (.he N nrro\I,;S unit service area between February 1954 and
<br />July 1956. The survey indicated that the physical properties of the
<br />irrigable land are favorR.ble for sustn.ined irrigation and that the full
<br />
|