Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r <br /> <br />48 <br /> <br />older structures. For this report, t.herelor~, future annual operation, <br />maintenance, a.nd replacement. costs are estimated a.t $3 per irrigated <br />acre. <br /> <br />Part VI-COORDINATE PROJECT FUNCTIONS <br /> <br />FLOOD CONTROL <br /> <br />Tbe Corps of Engineers evaluations of average 1I00d damages and <br />:Bood control benefits for the Narro\~.s unit were developed on the <br />basis of existing conditions and 1965 price levels. These evaluations <br />were made under tbe assumption that the upstream proposed Cbat- <br />lIeld Dam, which is autborized for construction by the Corps of <br />Engineers, would be in operation. As estimated by the corps, average <br />annualllood control damages are $1,730,000 and flood control benefits <br />from the Narrows Dam and Reservoir would be $961,000 without <br />diversion of Bijou 1I0ws and $1,123,000 with diversion of Bijou 1I0ws, <br />In order to obtain tbese flood control benefits, tbe peak down- <br />stream flows must be limited to 10,000 cubic feet per second, This <br />objective could be accomplisbed hy means of 550,000 acre-feet of <br />fl!?od control space in the reservoir. This entire capacity, however, <br />will be needed only during the most flood-prone se""on of tbe year, <br />Therefore, at tbe discretion of tbe Bureau of Reclamation 75000 aere- <br />feet of tbis 1I00d control space could be allocated to joint-us~ purpose <br />(flood control and irrigation). Such an allocation would reqUlre that <br />the joint-use srace be available lor flood cont.rol use through the main <br />flood season 0 each year. Alter this season, it would be available (or <br />conservation purposes. <br />A letter from the Corps of Engineers showing the evaluation of the <br />1I00d control reqUITements for .he Narrows 'unit is appe,nded, <br /> <br />FJ6H AND WILDL]l"E <br /> <br />;' <br /> <br />The appended reports by the Bureau of Sport Fisberies and Wildlife <br />Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, N. Mex., presents that <br />age?cy's plan of development for the N arrows unit, Tbe analysis of <br />project effects on ~sh and wildlife was predicated on projections made <br />of fishing and huntmg and other relaterluses under conditions expected <br />to prevail witho~t tbe project and witb the project in operation. <br />Both sets of prOjections were made for a 100-year period, Tbe dif- <br />fere~ces between such estimates, made on an annual basis, were then <br />attrIbuted to tbe Narrows unit as a mellSure of its effects, <br />Evaluation of the effects resulted in annual benefits of $198100 <br />assignable to the basic Narrows unit. The service made four rec~m- <br />meudatioDs which the Bureau of Reclamation has included in thE". <br />pIau of development that would yield additional benefits of $94600 <br />making total annual fisb and wildlife enhancement benefits of $292'700: <br />Table 9 is a summariza.tion of the benefits by category. ' <br />. The Fish und Wildlife Service estimated that the capitol cost o( <br />Its proposed 15,765-11cre wildlife management area wOllld be <br />$2,265,000, with annllal operntion, maintenance, and replacement <br />expenses of $37,000, Tbe lnnd requirements would consist of 8,545 <br />acre~ of normal reclam~tion fee title rights-of-way, 3,520 acres <br />speCIfically for fish and wildlife to be acquired in fee tilJe, and 3,700 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />49 <br /> <br />acres normally reclamation 1I00d ellSement lands which will also be <br />acquired in fee title. <br />Existing Jackson Lake is to be acquired and operated to jointly <br />serve tbe functions of fisb and wildlife and recreation, Tbe capi.B.l <br />cost of $125,000 for rehabilit.ation and tbe annual O,M, & R. expense <br />of $] 8,000 are to be sbared equally by the two functions, <br /> <br />TABLE 9.-FlSlt AND WILDLIfE ENHANCEMENT <br /> <br />Itlm <br /> <br />proJlICt <br />."eels <br /> <br />CluslfiClllioROf <br />Recommendations Addlllonll benefits <br />blnelitll <br /> <br />Total <br /> <br />thlion_l LDcaI <br /> <br />Wlrmwallfti,hinll: <br />NlrrOW'!lResllrvoir_____.. <br />B,low NlrrO\lrSOam.__. <br /> <br />____$150,000 <br />7,500 <br />15,000 <br />172,500 <br /> <br />$150,000 <br />7,500 <br />15,000 <br />17Z.~O <br /> <br />...___$150,000__..________ ______."________ <br />1.500 SOc.h.nowund $0,000 ___:: <br />ICCISS. <br />.lnMIr1tioninplln... 15,000. <br />21,000___ <br /> <br />JecksonLlkI___.. <br /> <br />Subtotal.. _.____ ..._________ 151,500 <br /> <br />Hunltnl: <br />WIllrlowL... _________ n.. 25,200 ManlllemllntulH___ <br />Upllndllmll(-Z4,800rnln.dIYS)__.. _____._ MiIIS'led___....____ <br />Othlr (-1,000 rnlll.dIYS)___.. ..____do..._ ________. <br /> <br />,H,OOJ. ______. 52,200 <br />4,500___.._____ 4,100 <br /> <br />52,200 <br />",SOD <br /> <br />Trlpph~:~~\~\.oil~itSf: --- n__ --.. _~~~~~ .Mijiiiiid~:" :~::::::_ _. ~~:~_::: :::::::___~:~~~__ ___~~~~~ <br />Waterfowl us,___. ______. ....______ 20,400 Mall'Jemant."a.__ 30,600 $51,000. 51,000 <br />Wildlrle.orltnladrllcreation__.. ....___ I,OOO___.do.____.....___ II,~______.._ 12,500 12,500 <br />Totllllnnu'lblnllfib._________ 198,100. 94,600 51,000 Z41,7OO Zi2,70Q <br /> <br />Some of tbe fish and wildlife measures will jointly serve the pur- <br />poses of mitigation and local and national enhancement. In accord- <br />ance. with provisions of t.he Federal Water Project Recreation Act <br />PublIc Law 89-72, the costs of fisb and wildlife mi.igation measure~ <br />are treated as joint costs and Lhe capital costs of measures lea.ding <br />to localllsh and wildlife benefits-excel" those related to waterfo wi <br />use like nesting, resting, and win taring-are to be costrsbared equally <br />by the ,Federal Govemm,en. an~ the non-Federal administering entity, <br />In addItIOn to costs specifically mcurred for fisb and wildlife measures <br />a share oC joint dam and reservoir capital and annual costs is allocated <br />to the function. <br /> <br />The allocations of capit,sl and annual costa a.re presented subse- <br />quently in part X of this planning report, <br /> <br />RECREATION <br /> <br />Two reports by the National Park Service are appended to this <br />planning report. Th~ first recr~ation report presented a plan of develop- <br />ment to serve the Imtlal antIcIpated publIc use. The second recreation <br />report projected the incre~sed visitor day. and, additional incremental <br />costs and benefits that Inlght result when ultimate recreation use is <br />reached at the Narrows Reservoir. The incremental development <br />based upon projected population increases, consists of four ]O-yea~ <br />stages oC development starting with year 11 of project operation. <br />Total benefits for the 50th year of operation are pro/.ected as constant <br />for the latter one-half of the 100-year period of ana ysis, <br />Bec~use of the stage ?evelopme.nt, it is necessa.ry for benefit-cost <br />analysIS and cost allocations to adjust coslB and benellt.. to take into <br />