|
<br />r
<br />
<br />48
<br />
<br />older structures. For this report, t.herelor~, future annual operation,
<br />maintenance, a.nd replacement. costs are estimated a.t $3 per irrigated
<br />acre.
<br />
<br />Part VI-COORDINATE PROJECT FUNCTIONS
<br />
<br />FLOOD CONTROL
<br />
<br />Tbe Corps of Engineers evaluations of average 1I00d damages and
<br />:Bood control benefits for the Narro\~.s unit were developed on the
<br />basis of existing conditions and 1965 price levels. These evaluations
<br />were made under tbe assumption that the upstream proposed Cbat-
<br />lIeld Dam, which is autborized for construction by the Corps of
<br />Engineers, would be in operation. As estimated by the corps, average
<br />annualllood control damages are $1,730,000 and flood control benefits
<br />from the Narrows Dam and Reservoir would be $961,000 without
<br />diversion of Bijou 1I0ws and $1,123,000 with diversion of Bijou 1I0ws,
<br />In order to obtain tbese flood control benefits, tbe peak down-
<br />stream flows must be limited to 10,000 cubic feet per second, This
<br />objective could be accomplisbed hy means of 550,000 acre-feet of
<br />fl!?od control space in the reservoir. This entire capacity, however,
<br />will be needed only during the most flood-prone se""on of tbe year,
<br />Therefore, at tbe discretion of tbe Bureau of Reclamation 75000 aere-
<br />feet of tbis 1I00d control space could be allocated to joint-us~ purpose
<br />(flood control and irrigation). Such an allocation would reqUlre that
<br />the joint-use srace be available lor flood cont.rol use through the main
<br />flood season 0 each year. Alter this season, it would be available (or
<br />conservation purposes.
<br />A letter from the Corps of Engineers showing the evaluation of the
<br />1I00d control reqUITements for .he Narrows 'unit is appe,nded,
<br />
<br />FJ6H AND WILDL]l"E
<br />
<br />;'
<br />
<br />The appended reports by the Bureau of Sport Fisberies and Wildlife
<br />Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, N. Mex., presents that
<br />age?cy's plan of development for the N arrows unit, Tbe analysis of
<br />project effects on ~sh and wildlife was predicated on projections made
<br />of fishing and huntmg and other relaterluses under conditions expected
<br />to prevail witho~t tbe project and witb the project in operation.
<br />Both sets of prOjections were made for a 100-year period, Tbe dif-
<br />fere~ces between such estimates, made on an annual basis, were then
<br />attrIbuted to tbe Narrows unit as a mellSure of its effects,
<br />Evaluation of the effects resulted in annual benefits of $198100
<br />assignable to the basic Narrows unit. The service made four rec~m-
<br />meudatioDs which the Bureau of Reclamation has included in thE".
<br />pIau of development that would yield additional benefits of $94600
<br />making total annual fisb and wildlife enhancement benefits of $292'700:
<br />Table 9 is a summariza.tion of the benefits by category. '
<br />. The Fish und Wildlife Service estimated that the capitol cost o(
<br />Its proposed 15,765-11cre wildlife management area wOllld be
<br />$2,265,000, with annllal operntion, maintenance, and replacement
<br />expenses of $37,000, Tbe lnnd requirements would consist of 8,545
<br />acre~ of normal reclam~tion fee title rights-of-way, 3,520 acres
<br />speCIfically for fish and wildlife to be acquired in fee tilJe, and 3,700
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />49
<br />
<br />acres normally reclamation 1I00d ellSement lands which will also be
<br />acquired in fee title.
<br />Existing Jackson Lake is to be acquired and operated to jointly
<br />serve tbe functions of fisb and wildlife and recreation, Tbe capi.B.l
<br />cost of $125,000 for rehabilit.ation and tbe annual O,M, & R. expense
<br />of $] 8,000 are to be sbared equally by the two functions,
<br />
<br />TABLE 9.-FlSlt AND WILDLIfE ENHANCEMENT
<br />
<br />Itlm
<br />
<br />proJlICt
<br />."eels
<br />
<br />CluslfiClllioROf
<br />Recommendations Addlllonll benefits
<br />blnelitll
<br />
<br />Total
<br />
<br />thlion_l LDcaI
<br />
<br />Wlrmwallfti,hinll:
<br />NlrrOW'!lResllrvoir_____..
<br />B,low NlrrO\lrSOam.__.
<br />
<br />____$150,000
<br />7,500
<br />15,000
<br />172,500
<br />
<br />$150,000
<br />7,500
<br />15,000
<br />17Z.~O
<br />
<br />...___$150,000__..________ ______."________
<br />1.500 SOc.h.nowund $0,000 ___::
<br />ICCISS.
<br />.lnMIr1tioninplln... 15,000.
<br />21,000___
<br />
<br />JecksonLlkI___..
<br />
<br />Subtotal.. _.____ ..._________ 151,500
<br />
<br />Hunltnl:
<br />WIllrlowL... _________ n.. 25,200 ManlllemllntulH___
<br />Upllndllmll(-Z4,800rnln.dIYS)__.. _____._ MiIIS'led___....____
<br />Othlr (-1,000 rnlll.dIYS)___.. ..____do..._ ________.
<br />
<br />,H,OOJ. ______. 52,200
<br />4,500___.._____ 4,100
<br />
<br />52,200
<br />",SOD
<br />
<br />Trlpph~:~~\~\.oil~itSf: --- n__ --.. _~~~~~ .Mijiiiiid~:" :~::::::_ _. ~~:~_::: :::::::___~:~~~__ ___~~~~~
<br />Waterfowl us,___. ______. ....______ 20,400 Mall'Jemant."a.__ 30,600 $51,000. 51,000
<br />Wildlrle.orltnladrllcreation__.. ....___ I,OOO___.do.____.....___ II,~______.._ 12,500 12,500
<br />Totllllnnu'lblnllfib._________ 198,100. 94,600 51,000 Z41,7OO Zi2,70Q
<br />
<br />Some of tbe fish and wildlife measures will jointly serve the pur-
<br />poses of mitigation and local and national enhancement. In accord-
<br />ance. with provisions of t.he Federal Water Project Recreation Act
<br />PublIc Law 89-72, the costs of fisb and wildlife mi.igation measure~
<br />are treated as joint costs and Lhe capital costs of measures lea.ding
<br />to localllsh and wildlife benefits-excel" those related to waterfo wi
<br />use like nesting, resting, and win taring-are to be costrsbared equally
<br />by the ,Federal Govemm,en. an~ the non-Federal administering entity,
<br />In addItIOn to costs specifically mcurred for fisb and wildlife measures
<br />a share oC joint dam and reservoir capital and annual costs is allocated
<br />to the function.
<br />
<br />The allocations of capit,sl and annual costa a.re presented subse-
<br />quently in part X of this planning report,
<br />
<br />RECREATION
<br />
<br />Two reports by the National Park Service are appended to this
<br />planning report. Th~ first recr~ation report presented a plan of develop-
<br />ment to serve the Imtlal antIcIpated publIc use. The second recreation
<br />report projected the incre~sed visitor day. and, additional incremental
<br />costs and benefits that Inlght result when ultimate recreation use is
<br />reached at the Narrows Reservoir. The incremental development
<br />based upon projected population increases, consists of four ]O-yea~
<br />stages oC development starting with year 11 of project operation.
<br />Total benefits for the 50th year of operation are pro/.ected as constant
<br />for the latter one-half of the 100-year period of ana ysis,
<br />Bec~use of the stage ?evelopme.nt, it is necessa.ry for benefit-cost
<br />analysIS and cost allocations to adjust coslB and benellt.. to take into
<br />
|