My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07068
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07068
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:25:36 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:04:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8141
Description
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
5
Date
5/15/1961
Author
US House of Represen
Title
Hearing before the Subcommittee on Irrigation and Reclamation of the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs House of Representatives on H R 2206 H R 2207 H R 2208 and H R 2209
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Legislation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />\-'3'" ,..., <br />;; . j.;) FRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT, COLORADO <br /> <br />51 <br /> <br />Committee on the hasis of figures supplied by the Department of Agri- <br />culture. The 1960 shift-over date, whell the whole ecollomy would <br />shift from surplus to deficit is projected by that committee, not by the <br />Bureau of Reclamatioll or not by me, as being about 198U. <br />There will be adjustments within that trend, of course, up or down, <br />as we progress. <br />Mr. HOSMER. IR relation to the short-term prediction with respect <br />to crop surpluses, in t.he next ]2 months ahead, even, do you have <br />any confidence in ~hes~ long-range predictions? <br />Mr. PAL~IEr... 1 e.'), sir; I clo. <br />Mr. HOSMER. But you do not. have confidence in the short-range <br />prediction? <br />Mr. PALMER. No: I did not say that, let. me add. You have a num- <br />ber of forces at work. One is a.s our population expands our land <br />ava.ilable for crops is decreasing at the rate. of about a minion acres <br />u. year. 'Ve are replnciug thai.. in part by clltting down timberland <br />Rnd by t.rtlllsfe.rring land out of p:lstUl'e.. . <br />Mr. HOSMER. And by a vastly accelerated productlOll per acre. <br />:Mr. P.\L\IER. Yes, sir, this we are doing. <br />Mr.Hos"ER. Yes. <br />~rl'. P.-\T.l\IER. By IflS0 01' :wno t.he- projections t,hat nre outlined in <br />the Senate select committee report. indicate that YOll have to ha.ve a <br />tremendous increase in prodnction per :lcro coupled wit.h the con- <br />,'or310n of lanel from pasture and timuel' tu attain the. necessary goals. <br />May I snmma rize for the record 1 <br />I will have to supply that. I thought I had the table here with me. <br />Mr. HOSMER. I think the upshot of it is that these are estimates aRd <br />they could be way off and thev could be fairly ace-urate. <br />The ot.her thing I waRt. t'o ask about. is t.his "rapidly growiRg <br />population in the area." It is upon this that you base the need for <br />this $169,950,000. None of these new popnli is going to be \\"orking on <br />these.farms, is it ~ <br />Mr. PALMER. All of them would benefit by t.he project. Those that <br />lived in the cities would benefit by improved domestic water supply, <br />t.hose t.hat worked in tho industries would \l('nefit hy better job 01'- <br />port.nnit.ies, ancl t.hose wlio han(lIed the pllcking' nlHl processing' indus. <br />tries from the fact that they had crops and produce t.O benefit. by. <br />~fr. Hosl\fEn. :hfr. Palmer, mv question was on account. of the six- <br />tenth of an acre-foot of water area that you are going to put on <br />208,500 acres or whatever it is; nre there going to be any of this <br />increased population employed on the farms? <br />:hfr. PALMER. As far us the area is concerned, ~[J". Hosmer, it is now, <br />as has been t.est.ified, a fully developed a.ren. The challces of mass <br />settleJJl,cnt, of course, are absent. , <br />Ii"fr . "MER. Thlltisright. 'I <br />. L'mR. But there won),] be people employed as I pointed out <br />in Ii', '-'tIcking and pr,'Qcessing indust.ries that are not now employed. <br />. ...HOS"ER. I "Insk yon about that later. All I want to ask <br />Ubf}~lt, l10W is about t ,.rIns. <br />Ho\\: mnny new jo .')~l farms, packing industry, municipal govern- <br />ment., III to!a], all new' jobs that you anticipate will be created by <br />reason of tIllS proJect! <br />MI'. PALMER. 'We can develop a figure on that if I may supply it.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.