Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ ~ l"" (' <br />,501.0':;':' FRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT, COLORADO <br /> <br />that is true in all of these fields in the production of hay !LIld so on. <br />And in my area we lmve Iitera]]y /!lop ~ho".sands of acres where we <br />are paying farmers not to cut It anO It IS difficult for me to see how <br />we can suggest that this is going to improve the situation by saying <br />to another group that we are takiag Government dollars in your c!,"e <br />and promotmg the future production of exact.!y the same commodItIes. <br />That is a II, Mr, Chairman. <br />Mr. HOSAfER. Does the gentleman y}eJd j , <br />Mr. LANGEN. I will be happy to YIeld to the gentleman from Cah- <br />iornin.. <br />Mr. HOS>lER. You mentioned, Mr. Palmer, a shift over from a crop <br />surplus country to a crop deficit country. \Vhen in time do your <br />calculations indicate this shift over will occur! <br />Mr, PAL'IER, As I recall, there are two sets of estimates prepared <br />by the Department of Agriculture. The first of these projects that, <br />under certain assumptioRs, the shift might comes as early as the later <br />part of the 1960's. <br />~Ir. HOSMER. Nineteen when? <br />Mr. PAUfER. The 1960's, toward 1970. I believe the cunsensus, how- <br />ever, the figul'es that are the most highly regarded by the U.S. De- <br />partment of Agriculture pe.ople now, are those figures that appear in <br />the Senate Select Committee report that projects that somewhere <br />about 1980. <br />Mr. HOSMER. About 1980, Now we are still going up on a surplus <br />scale; are we not! We have not hit the surplus peak yet, according <br />to those figures, <br />Mr. PALMER, No- <br />Mr. HOSMER. V\'hen does that occur 1 <br />Mr. PAL.rER. No; I am not sure I could agree with you on that. <br />I think there are a number of things you have to consider separately. <br />Mr. HOSAfER. I did not ask you to agree with me, I jnst asked you <br />what the report shows as to when we hit the peak. <br />Mr. P"\LMER. I "annot answer that without giving this little bit <br />of explanation. Sf! long as you have an agricnltural policy that snp- <br />ports prIces at n. glyen figure and puts no restrictions on ho\~ much <br />of, that particular kind of crop an individual grows, you could con- <br />cel~ably have an upward trend in that crop surplus figure over a long <br />perIOd of years, <br />Mr. HOSMER. These figures depenrl then wholly on what the farm- <br />support laws of the couutry are; is that right! <br />Mr, P,\L>IER, I t,hink they depend in part upon that, Mr. Hosmer. <br />Again, I would like to point out thut so many of these t,hings are <br />not within the control of any specific reclamation project. <br />Mr. HOSMER, Just a minute now. 1 w,mt to point out the reason <br />that 1 am asking you this question so that perhaps you could p:ive me <br />a better answer. You stated flatly that we are going to shift over <br />from a surplus to a deficit farm ec:onomy. And that we are rushing <br />in under the wire essentially in the nick of time with the Fryingpan- <br />Ar~"RSaS project. And I 'am trying to evaluate these figures npon <br />whICh vou made, or UpOR which you base, these statements, Would <br />you respond in that contexH ' , <br />Mr. P AUrER. Yes, sir, and I would like also to poiRt out that <br />the figures I gave you are those developed by the Seuate Select <br />