Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r ~c 9 <br />j; .....; FRYINGPA~-ARKANSAS PROJECT, COLORADO <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />One of t.he TIe,," matters that ,,'ill he coming IIp here nt t.his t,ime <br />Iins to do with the interest formula. It is only right t.hat reclnmntion <br />programs find all wnte-r l'e_SQnl'ce programs follow the s~lIne procedures <br />and t,hat they have t.he same benefits and ha.Ye to bear t.he same respon- <br />sibility. This project has been propo~ed heretofore with n 21h-percent <br />interest rate whieh is lower thall the interest rate in most pl'ojeets. <br />Now we brin~ it in line with t.he other formula. applicable to a.Il water <br />]"(~~ource proJects. <br />'Ve han~ also the question of repaYlJlent. and the term of repayment. <br />It. is genernlly accepted t.hat 40 years plus 10 years dCH:>.loplllent is a <br />(~(ll'l'(,ct J'e,payment pe-riod for l'eelamation. This project. has ne\'er <br />!.pen eonsid.,..red on tha.t basis until now and now we consider it on Do <br />repayment basis of :")0 years from thr- time of completion of the <br />p<\ltitular part. of t.he projed, bringing it illto direct alignment with <br />recognized reclamation policies. <br />'Ye also have the quest.ion of alloeat.lon of tlw cost of construction <br />on the rep~lymellt for Ruedi Resen'oir which is a. new program with <br />t.he new reservoir to be built il":i a compensator'V reser11Oir. <br />:May I ~ay t.o m.y friends from the sOl1t.heastel'll part, of Colorado, I <br />think it i:-. a. wondl~rfl1l posltion that yon haye taken. tha.t until the <br />t.ime when t.he, water users of t.he R.uedi Re~el'\'oir C:Ul pay for this <br />nroject that. you yourselves arc rendy and willing to see that lJncle <br />Snm is rep~lid, To me, that makes this project l'e:uly for consid- <br />prntion. <br />.Another thing that is ne.w! and one wlti(~h we n1l1st Ilflve S0me <br />t.estimony on during these hearings, llns t.o do wit,ll the pO:-isible fnture <br />lIses of the waters which are to be stored in Hlledi and whi('h aI.:~ to be <br />used in westcnl Colorado not. only as exchange water::;, hut 'iis new <br />primary uses, "'e must have something~ we must write some kind of <br />a legislative history on that. rroposit.ion or we willlJP' eternally plagued <br />with the proposition just lIke we h:1\"e been in the Green !Iountain <br />R.eservoir project. <br />Remaining new matter hns to do .with an.'~ clarification lle/~essary <br />in the j'e\'i::;ed operating principles so we all will understand what <br />is involved, At long last \....e have comparative agreement between <br />eastern ann west(,-l'll Colorado people. 'Ve have not remO\-ed the <br />opposition of all segments heefluse we st.ill have some in the Pitkin <br />County area, but it is opposition whieh is reeognizNl. Those who <br />!'uPPOl't. t.his opposit.ion are honest in their posit.ion_ There is no qnes- <br />tion about that. I t.hink our legislnt,iye history should be written <br />to s.how it will be plain and clear thnt the Hsers 'of western Colorado <br />nre not. p,ndnngered hy what. is proposed in this legislation. <br />'Vit.h thnt in mind, I think that we can pl'oceed ,'ery quickly ,yith <br />tl.\is !eg-islnt.ion. 'Ve can hear any Jlew t.estimollY that has come in <br />ob. the-se particular matters I have sugge:-ited j we cnn refuse to repeat, <br />if that, is possible, matters that '!l'e ,,'ready in the record, because we <br />do ht\ve. a volllmlno\ls re('Ard. <br />For the new members of the committee \':110 will hear this pres- <br />entation mo~~i!ttain].y .we wi]] ~ish to take tll,!i,~i.me so that they can <br />understand J . .;what IS lI1vo]ved 1I1 tIllS ]eglslatwIY; <br />Thank vou I.r. Chairman. <br />Mr. ROGE"". The Chair will now recognize Mr. Che~oweth, of Co]o- <br />rado, author of H. R 2207, for any statement he may desire to make. <br /> <br />~ <br />l'.lf <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />:l~ . <br />