My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07057
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:25:32 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:04:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8141.600.20
Description
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project - Studies - Environmental Studies
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
5
Date
4/16/1975
Author
US DoI BoR
Title
Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 of 2, Pages IX-34 to Appendix
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />... ."" .. ,",",\ <br />'1\a;;;' <br />has furnished information on lands withdrawn for the Project and <br />has checked unpatented mining claims in the area. Cooperative <br />hydrologic programs are conducted with the Geological Survey, <br />Weather Service, Soil Conservation Service and Corps of Engineers. <br />The Forest Service through Memorandums of Agreement, Fish and <br />Wildlife Service, the Colorado Div~sion of Wildlife, the National <br />Park Service and other Federal, State and local agencies as well <br />as members of the public have provided guidance and assistance to <br />insure that environmental protective measures are considered <br />during Project development and incorporated into the design of <br />the features. Numerous reports have been prepared by these and <br />other agencies which generally provide the basis of the economic <br />and environmental evaluation for the Project. Some of these <br />reports are listed in the bibliography. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In November 1966, public hearings were held at Aspen Institute <br />to discuss the possibility of building the 'Hunter Tunnel as an <br />all tunnel system with drop inlets based on public objection to a <br />conduit system which required construction of an access road <br />through the scenic Hunter Creek area on the western slope. About <br />One year later, the Project plan was modified to replace the conduit <br />and access road plan with an all tunnel system which would preserve <br />to the fullest practical extent the natural environment of the <br />Hunter Creek drainage. <br /> <br />The Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District and the <br />news media have been instrumental in keeping the public informed on <br />changes in the Project plan and on construction progress. The <br />District has also presented testimony in Congressional Hearings in <br />support of the Project and for appropriations for the development. <br /> <br />Several educational institutions have conducted studies related <br />to biologic and cultural aspects of the Project. Archeologic <br />studies have been conducted by the University of Denver and Southern <br />Colorado State College under contract with the National Park Service <br />in areas of the Project prior to initiation of construction. Colorado <br />State University has conducted vegetative studies in the Project <br />area. <br /> <br />2. Post-NEPA Consultation and Coordination <br /> <br />The National Environmental Policy Act became effective at a time <br />when the Project had been under construction for more than five <br />years. The act and the environmental awareness which has prevailed <br />has focused public attention on water resource development projects. <br />Articles by the news media have prompted resurrection of some ideas <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />X-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.