My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07057
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:25:32 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:04:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8141.600.20
Description
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project - Studies - Environmental Studies
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
5
Date
4/16/1975
Author
US DoI BoR
Title
Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 of 2, Pages IX-34 to Appendix
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br />4Gli. <br /> <br />Federal legislation authorizing a diversion project was first <br />introduced in Congress in 1951. Congressional hearings on the <br />diversion project ensued for several years which provided oppor- <br />tunity for many interests to express support and opposition to <br />the proposed project. During the decade in which Congressional <br />Hearings were held, it became apparent that ,some western slope <br />interests objected to the project plan, particularly concerning <br />the Aspen Dam and Reservoir site near Aspen, Colorado. As a <br />result, in 1958 the Colorado Water Conservation Board instigated <br />consideration of a substitute replacement reservoir for the Aspen <br />feature. Various alternative sites were considered. All of <br />them except the Ruedi Reservoir site were rejected because of <br />geologic, water supply, or other limitations. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The geology snd water supply conditions at the Ruedi Reservoir <br />site permitted the development of a larger reservoir than was <br />contemplated above Aspen. By comparison, the plan for Ruedi <br />Reservoir provided for approximately 100,000 acre-feet of active <br />storage capacity while Aspen Reservoir had been planned for only <br />28,000 acre-feet of active storage capacity. Ruedi Reservoir, <br />therefore, not only met the replacement requirements of the <br />Fryingpan-Arkansas Project but provided an additional storage <br />capacity to regulate the water supply for other uses on the <br />western slope. <br /> <br />Following selection of the Ruedi site, the Colorado Water Con- <br />servation Board reconstituted a policy and review committee for <br />the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project on January 14. 1959. The committee <br />consisted of representatives of the Colorado Water Conservstion <br />Board, the Colorado River Water Conservation District, the <br />Southeaatern Colorado Water Conservancy District, and the Colorado <br />Division of Wildlife. The revised Operating Principles were <br />completed and approved by the policy and review committee and <br />the Governor of Colorado on April 30, 1959. The "Operating <br />Principles, Fryingpan-Arkansas Project" were amended December <br />30, 1959, and December 9, 1960, and published as House Document <br />No. 130, 87th Congress, 1st Session. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Project plan as modified by the "Reevaluation Statement, <br />Fryingpan-Arkansas Project" dated January 1960 was authorized <br />by Public Law 87-590 which was signed into law on August 16, <br />1962. Since authorization, Bureau of Reclamation officials have <br />met and corresponded with the public to discuss and explain the <br />complex multipurpose Project. <br /> <br />,Many Federal and State agencies have assisted the Bureau of <br />Reclamation in development of the Project. The Bureau of Land Management <br /> <br />X-2 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.