My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07047
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07047
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:25:29 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:04:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8143.600.30A
Description
John Martin Reservoir - Other Studies
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/1/1938
Title
Caddoa Reservoir Study - Summary of Assumed Operation No 2
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />":.'':~> <br />-';~:7.':~': . <br /> <br />a <br /> <br />" ; <br /> <br />'""'" <br />W <br />~) <br />~ <br /> <br />~'- <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br />I/i tll respect to th-e -dfsr-osition-of -the- waters-of--the- Caddoa- reser-voir_if__and _when__ ,-- <br />to <br />it is constructed, in I<hich event the a8reement isrbecome a stipulation in the <br /> <br />pending case between Colorado and Kansas over the uses of the water of the <br /> <br />Arkansas river. <br /> <br />For the above reasons another complete study has been made of the Caddoa <br /> <br />reservoir. This study brin~s the former investi?ation up to date Ilith respect to <br /> <br />water supply; determines the benefit to be derived by the individual Colol'"do <br /> <br />canals from the reservoir; determines the value of the reservoir from an economic <br /> <br />standpoint; takes into consideration the terms of the tentative Kansas-Colorado <br /> <br />a~reement with respect to the allocation of benefits from the reservoir to the <br /> <br />two states; and in the asswned operation of the reservoir, reco~~izes fully <br /> <br />Colorado irri~ation laws and administrative procedure. <br /> <br />'i'he follo'"in,,: discussion "'i ves the conclusions of the study, tOfether with <br /> <br />a brief description of the methods used to arrive at those conclusions. Several <br /> <br />voluminous detailed tables of water supply, reservoir operation, and crop <br /> <br />statistics are not attached, but are available for inspection. This also is true <br /> <br />of several ,":rapr.s showinp; canal and reservoir operations and crop statistics <br /> <br />plotted aC',ainst V1!'lter supply. A list of such tables and "raphs is "iven at the <br /> <br />end of the report. <br /> <br />It must be understood that certain assumptions were made as to irrication <br /> <br />requirements within the area to be served by the reservoir in order to arrive at <br /> <br />s lo~ical demand for supplemental ~ater. The canals mi~ht operate differently <br />than assumed if the reservoir were constructed. However, this would not <br /> <br />n;aterially affect the conclusions as to the amount of supplemental water made <br /> <br />available by the reservoir. Also, the benefits derived by the Colorado canals <br /> <br />from the reservoir could be distributed 'on a different basis than that assumed, <br /> <br />providing the aggregate did not exceed the total benefit as arrived at in this <br /> <br />studyc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.