Laserfiche WebLink
<br />w <br />00 <br />00 <br />~"7) <br /> <br />CRSS COMPUTER SIMULATIONS <br /> <br />Current Conditions <br /> <br />Historical flow and salinity conditions for the Colorado River at <br />Imperial Dam are depicted on figures 3 and 4, respectively. Figure 3 shows <br />that the amount of water that reached Imperial Dam in 1983 was almost 17 <br />million acre-feet. However, since the closure of Glen Canyon Dam, with the <br />exception of 1980 and 1983, flows at Imperial Dam have fluctuated within <br />the narrow range of 5 to 7 million acre-feet, primarily due to the filling <br />of Lake Powell (1963-1980). <br /> <br />The additional water in 1980 and 1983 had a diluting effect on the salinity <br />concentrations at Imperial Dam and other upstream reservoirs. Figure 4 shows <br />that the :flow-weighted average annual salinity in 1983 at Imperial Dam was <br />732 mg/L, the lowest level since 19.53 when it was 690 mg/L. <br /> <br />In 1983 at Lake Powell, it is estimated that the sal inity levels were about <br />400 mg/L, down from about 525 mg/L in the previous year. <br /> <br />The 1983 salinity reductions at Imperial Dam were due to excess flow and <br />are expected to have only a temporary impact on future, salinity projections. <br />Salinity reductions in Lake Powell will have an impact on short-term <br />salinity projections, but will have no impact on long-term projections. <br /> <br />The 1983 flow and salinity conditions represent the initial, or starting, <br />conditionS for future CRSS scenarios. Significantly lower TDS at Imperial <br />Dam, full reservoir conditions, and improved salt loading estimates, coupled <br />with lower rate of depletions, have essent'ially slowed the projected TDS <br />increase at Imperial Dam. Continued high flow conditions in 1984 are <br />expected to further influence the conditions projected by the model. <br /> <br />In addition, some entities had felt that the present level salt loading used <br />by Reclamation in CRSS was too high. This sparked a number of studies to <br />determi neif there we re trends in the hi stori ca 1 data base, 0 r if some errors <br />had been made in the process of developing a natural flow and salt data <br />base. Some trends were found in the historical salt load; however, the major <br />part of the difference was in the natural salt load. Extrapolating salt-flow <br />coefficients from a mean annual load to an annual load necessitated further <br />adjustments due to the skew of the hydrologic data base. JhE!~e ~pjustments <br />had the effect of reducing the natural salt load by approx'iiriiile.1'/400,OOO <br />tons. This correction brings Reclamation's calculation of the natural salt <br />load of the Colorado River closer to the Forum's analysis. <br /> <br />Scenarios and Assumptions <br /> <br />A total of ;five different scenarios were Evaluated using CRSS, with <br />different combinations of Water Quality Improvement Projects and depletion <br />schedules. . Appendix E contains the tables showing the tons of salt removed <br />by the various units in the scenarios analY2ed by CRSS. Two different <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />,j <br /> <br />--~ -, <br /> <br />J <br />';i <br />/1 <br />'j <br />1 <br />j <br />.:, <br /> <br />',- <br /> <br />