|
<br />SUMMARY (Continued)
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />Summary Table 5 1/
<br />Cost-effectiveness comparison with other salinity control unit&-
<br />
<br />Unit
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />Total
<br />annual
<br />cos ts
<br />
<br />$2,644,000
<br />269,000
<br />
<br />439,000
<br />
<br />2,438,000
<br />3,128,000
<br />4,063,000
<br />989,000
<br />1,834,000
<br />12,891,000
<br />
<br />692,000
<br />69,000
<br />853,000
<br />271,000
<br />
<br />1,634,000
<br />
<br />532,000
<br />711 ,000
<br />582,000
<br />3,152,000
<br />
<br />2,905,000
<br />843,000
<br />201,000
<br />231,000
<br />813,000
<br />5,098,000
<br />18,587,000
<br />
<br />200,500
<br />400,400
<br />797,000
<br />76,800
<br />468,800
<br />303,400
<br />2,246,900
<br />
<br />1,292,000
<br />?)729,OOO
<br />2,021,000
<br />5/8 percent
<br />
<br />S-23
<br />
<br />Average
<br />salt load
<br />reduction
<br />(tons/year)
<br />
<br />19,900
<br />19,000
<br />
<br />74,300
<br />
<br />14,900
<br />17,800
<br />20,800
<br />4,900
<br />7,900
<br />140,600
<br />
<br />19,500
<br />1,600
<br />13,000
<br />3,400
<br />
<br />20,000
<br />
<br />6,400
<br />8,500
<br />4,800
<br />23,300
<br />
<br />19,800
<br />4,700
<br />900
<br />1,000
<br />3,400
<br />13,200
<br />143,500
<br />
<br />3,400
<br />6,400
<br />9,000
<br />900
<br />3,700
<br />2,100
<br />~/25,500
<br />
<br />and a
<br />
<br />14,300
<br />6,600
<br />20,900
<br />50-year
<br />
<br />Cost
<br />effectiveness
<br />($/ton)
<br />lncre- Cumula-
<br />mental tive
<br />
<br />133
<br />14
<br />
<br />164
<br />176
<br />195
<br />202
<br />232
<br />
<br />35
<br />43
<br />66
<br />80
<br />
<br />82
<br />
<br />83
<br />84
<br />121
<br />135
<br />
<br />147
<br />179
<br />223
<br />231
<br />239
<br />386
<br />
<br />59
<br />63
<br />88
<br />88
<br />125
<br />144
<br />
<br />90
<br />!l/1l0
<br />
<br />133
<br />14
<br />
<br />6
<br />
<br />6
<br />
<br />Completed~/
<br />Grand Valley Unit, Stage One Development
<br />
<br />Meeker Domel.!
<br />Planned~/
<br />Lower Gunnison Basin
<br />Winter water replacement
<br />Canal systems
<br />East
<br />Selig
<br />South
<br />Garnet
<br />Loutzenhizer
<br />Total
<br />Grand Valley Unit, Stage Two Development
<br />Price Ditch laterals
<br />Stub Ditch laterals
<br />Grand Valley Canal laterals1/
<br />Kiefer Extension laterals
<br />West end portion, Government Highline
<br />Canal laterals
<br />East end portion, Government Highline
<br />Canal laterals
<br />West end portion, Government Highline Canal
<br />Grand Valley Highline Canal laterals
<br />East end portion, Government Highline Canal
<br />Middle portion, Government Highline Canal
<br />laterals
<br />Grand Valley Mainline Canal laterals
<br />Independent Ranchmen's Ditch laterals
<br />Orchard Mesa Canal No. 2 laterals
<br />Orchard Mesa Canal No. I laterals
<br />Middle portion, Government Highline Canal
<br />Total
<br />Uinta Basin Unit
<br />Zimmerman Wash subarea
<br />Pleasant Valley subarea
<br />Gray Mountain subarea
<br />Pahcease subarea
<br />South Fork Dry Gulch subarea
<br />Purdy-Midview subarea
<br />Total
<br />Dirty Devil River Unit
<br />Hanksville Salt Wash
<br />Emery South Salt Wash
<br />Total
<br />1/ Based on current planning interest rate of 8
<br />as noted.
<br />2/ As-constructed costs.
<br />3/ Based on a lOa-year project life.
<br />4/ Based on January 1985 price level.
<br />5/ Includes the Mesa County Ditch laterals.
<br />6/ Adjusted to account for the increase resulting from wildlife mitigation. Actual total salt
<br />load reduction could range from 21,000 to 30,000 tons per year.
<br />7/ This cost reflects the current economic value of power. CRSP power would be used on
<br />unit during actual operation, lowering the operation, maintenance, and replacement cost of
<br />washes from $851,000 to $583,000 and the overall cost effectiveness from $97 to $84 per ton of
<br />removed.
<br />8/ Includes the cost of testing and characterizing the receiving formation. Results of the
<br />test will also be used for the Hanksville Salt Wash increment.
<br />
<br />32
<br />56
<br />79
<br />83
<br />92
<br />
<br />35
<br />36
<br />47
<br />50
<br />
<br />61
<br />
<br />63
<br />66
<br />69
<br />85
<br />
<br />95
<br />98
<br />99
<br />100
<br />104
<br />130
<br />
<br />59
<br />61
<br />74
<br />75
<br />83
<br />88
<br />
<br />90
<br />97
<br />
<br />project life, except
<br />
<br />002331
<br />
<br />this
<br />both
<br />salt
<br />
|