Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />rlprap, there were some small bushes and trees beginning to grow. These were not <br />signiflcanl at the time of our visit. Then! were no evidences of significant erosion damage <br />on the upstream slope. There were a fIIw small rodent holes along the upper portion of <br />the slope which did not appear to ailed the Integrity of the structure. <br /> <br />5,2,2.4 Downstream Face <br /> <br />Generally. the downstream face was sparsely covered with grasses. There were no <br />Indications of cracks, settlements, depressions, or bulges on the downstream face, and there <br />were no Indicallons of signiflcanl erosion. A dttch and berm have been constructed on the <br />road across the downstream face to dired: water from the downstream face. The discharge <br />end of Ihe ditch was beginning to erode back across Ihe downstream face of the dam, <br />There were a number of smalllrees .rowing on the downslream face. These were generally <br />about 1 to 4 feet tall, except on the extreme left end of the embankmenl, where there were <br />a few aspen trees about 15 to 20 feel tall. <br /> <br />5,2,2,5 Seepage <br /> <br />The seepage area between about Stations 114 + 00 and 117 + 00 was dry at the time of our <br />AuguSI 1990 vlstt. This area was generaDy covered wtth vegetation and deadwood, and did <br />not show any evidences of erosion from flowing water. Several areas of seepage were <br />observed extting into the right side of the discharge channel near the energy dissipator and <br />exlendlng about 60 feet downslream. These flows were clear and no evidence of particle <br />migration was observed. The majority 01 the flow was confined to an area about 10 feet <br />by 10 feet, lcealed about 60 feel downslream of the energy dlssipator. This area had been <br />covered wtth gravel and stones, and the seepage was collected and measured In a V-notch <br />weir. It Is estimated that 0,5 to 1 gaBon per minute of water was flowing through the V- <br />notch weir at the time of our vlstt. <br /> <br />5,2,3 OUTLET WORKS <br /> <br />The outlet works were In operation at Ihe lime of our vlstt; therefore, the Intake structure and <br />condutt could not be observed. Those portions of the energy disslpator which were visible <br />appeared to be In good condttion, No signiicant delerioration or cracking of the concrete were <br />noted, However, the lower surfaces of the energy disslpator could not be observed due to <br /> <br />5-4 <br />