Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MONTROSE CHAMBER COMM, TEL:1-303-~49-~907 <br /> <br />Oc t 18.95 <br /> <br />14:30 No,OOl R,~l <br /> <br />." , <br />",'..'" <br /> <br />'i " : ::\~;::.';~/ <br />~,';i <br /> <br />;', <br /> <br />, , <br /> <br /><l, ,,:1 <br /> <br />I' <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />,.. ':" <br />,.- :,: ,;.'} ;:;.J~';':;,(~,\~~,~~;~:.":" <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />. '." <br /> <br />" . <br /> <br />IRM CorpOrAte ApplitJItiOD$ ,'.,'," " ' ' <br />This group, in collaboration \\'ith theC~Rs and Other Cus~lners, 'develops and suppOrts <br />Westemwide cOrporate' (monnation resource management applications.' , <br />(. ." , '''. " , <br /> <br />Comments opposed shit\ing llIlydata ~mmunications 'responsibility out of ADPIIRM. Enough <br />evidence waS ryUsed to perSUlJde sepior management ,that the final "WiU Be" needed to be neutral <br />,on this issue: 'To,~esqlyo ibis jssue" ~ :CollaborativeproC!ls~ involving iriterest~lll(pertstaif fr~iri' <br />,tbe CAO ahd theChiec,})r~&rain()fliCewiQ beinitiatod, Other cOnuilcmts 5ugge~ed'that IODg- <br />" t,ermi?O$t saVingscouldQe:a@lilpUshed,liyayojciing the Cll:Pense'ofleasecl clrcuit$ in favor of, ' <br />, ,', ,microw,ave~uP~~~:~~';suPiiO~Co#uniCatioris~,ThisissUe will 8lso;be-addressedthrough a ',' <br />'coUabon~tiveprocess,',' :,,' ',' },' ,,' ,', ',,",," '. '", ,,', ", <br />, " ,.' .. ,:,....". ';,' ',,<<' ,,"..: '''';':'::''''''' :,:,'.., :'" ,.'.',:: .'.. :. ",,:,,:,',,' .' ~'":":,:,)~:";.",~"::,,,,,,,,.::.,', :': ,,:'.;, ,: ' ' <br />, .' Staffillgfor .operail~i1s ,Was:~ s.ubj~f:pf:Co_,':pu~ to the HQresponsibiliiyfor several <br />,W!lstCrl\Wld,eapplicati9ns,'i!icluding',the need 'tQ 'stafmu1tiple Shi&, "jt was Suggested that a CSO' <br />, ' ' s~oftMee\Vas t09's.~I lind aiiinCiease tO~eeop~tio~s,Stafrineach CSR maybe too ' , <br />large. .Thi~conunentappeaiS~ha~'som(lv.ndity; 'and ne~8;tObeaddres~d through' a" . <br />" collaborative prqcessWithin,the lRM~inritunity.' staffing levels may ,be adjuSted depending on <br />the out,c<mio,of.thiscpl!abOfat!O!l., .. ,'. ',' ,.', , " " " <br />, ," '< " " " :. '~'; ;.\,:'.', " '" I, ,:' ' <br />" .- ,~, ",~'"":",:'.,,,,<'.".';":,,: ':".,<'\,".,:'""'",...",, ,~".'" .~,,' ',',,", ":, , . <br />The proposed ~W111Bo" <:a\I~for:a proposed70nO split'l)etWeentheFederal workforce and <br />Cflntractor ~u'ppott In:~~tic>it'lofthe competitive IRMjob market. and the need to ,assure' <br />that :Westem:basthllriShtb~oe be~een:workforceco,n~l,I\lity aitdup-to-date skills,this <br />balance has been chanBedtO a 50150 spilt for aIllRM officesWestllinwide. Ifnecessary" <br />adjustments to tJlis'split may~,e made by lRM ~gers based upon such factors as local job <br />market conditions. . ..' ,',," '.,., '", ",' , , , ',' " <br />. '" ""', I,."" ' , , <br /> <br />, I FillaI staffinglIWel;12 FTE, 12 Contractor <br />, , ' <br /> <br />\" .. ~, ..' ; <br />lRMCSOSupporf," ,,' ",',' <br />, The IRM CSO Support gTOUpsupports tlWcomputer and information Iriana~ementn~ of <br />I people who wo~iit theCSO. ' , ~ ' <br /> <br />" , <br /> <br />, ' ," ,; "", ,""" ",' " , ,I <br />Several comments suggested that the ~fimCt,onshould becentra1ized, and that a C6rporate <br />'Infonnation Office, be established that reports directly to the Admini$traior, in recognition of its <br />.importan~.lt wa,s fiJrthefs~ggested that the CSO'aiIdeorporate appUcations groups could be <br />combined' and report to t1ie.smte IRM manager. "',' , , <br /> <br />In' consid~ring this 'comment/seIliClrmanagers determined ,they need more focus on Western's <br />coqiorate IRM stratllgy in the future, Rather than establishing another direcireport to the <br />Administrator, the senior man~sers recOgnize that they neee! t~be involved in andprovidc future <br />direction forWestem'sIRM functions, The ,final "WIlIBe" doe,S not centralize IRM,relying , <br />instead on ihemodcl of (jecentTalization imd collaboration to meet the needs oflRM customers. <br />The eso and corporate applications groups will not be merged, to assurll focus 01'1 their <br />, respective responsibilities and to avoid the risk of CSO support becoming a secondal)' priority, <br /> <br />Final staffing level: 9,5 prE, 9,5 contraCtor <br />