<br />MONTROSE CHAMBER COMM, TEL:1-303-~49-~907
<br />
<br />Oc t 18.95
<br />
<br />14:30 No,OOl R,~l
<br />
<br />." ,
<br />",'..'"
<br />
<br />'i " : ::\~;::.';~/
<br />~,';i
<br />
<br />;',
<br />
<br />, ,
<br />
<br /><l, ,,:1
<br />
<br />I'
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />,.. ':"
<br />,.- :,: ,;.'} ;:;.J~';':;,(~,\~~,~~;~:.":"
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />. '."
<br />
<br />" .
<br />
<br />IRM CorpOrAte ApplitJItiOD$ ,'.,'," " ' '
<br />This group, in collaboration \\'ith theC~Rs and Other Cus~lners, 'develops and suppOrts
<br />Westemwide cOrporate' (monnation resource management applications.' ,
<br />(. ." , '''. " ,
<br />
<br />Comments opposed shit\ing llIlydata ~mmunications 'responsibility out of ADPIIRM. Enough
<br />evidence waS ryUsed to perSUlJde sepior management ,that the final "WiU Be" needed to be neutral
<br />,on this issue: 'To,~esqlyo ibis jssue" ~ :CollaborativeproC!ls~ involving iriterest~lll(pertstaif fr~iri'
<br />,tbe CAO ahd theChiec,})r~&rain()fliCewiQ beinitiatod, Other cOnuilcmts 5ugge~ed'that IODg-
<br />" t,ermi?O$t saVingscouldQe:a@lilpUshed,liyayojciing the Cll:Pense'ofleasecl clrcuit$ in favor of, '
<br />, ,', ,microw,ave~uP~~~:~~';suPiiO~Co#uniCatioris~,ThisissUe will 8lso;be-addressedthrough a ','
<br />'coUabon~tiveprocess,',' :,,' ',' },' ,,' ,', ',,",," '. '", ,,', ",
<br />, " ,.' .. ,:,....". ';,' ',,<<' ,,"..: '''';':'::''''''' :,:,'.., :'" ,.'.',:: .'.. :. ",,:,,:,',,' .' ~'":":,:,)~:";.",~"::,,,,,,,,.::.,', :': ,,:'.;, ,: ' '
<br />, .' Staffillgfor .operail~i1s ,Was:~ s.ubj~f:pf:Co_,':pu~ to the HQresponsibiliiyfor several
<br />,W!lstCrl\Wld,eapplicati9ns,'i!icluding',the need 'tQ 'stafmu1tiple Shi&, "jt was Suggested that a CSO'
<br />, ' ' s~oftMee\Vas t09's.~I lind aiiinCiease tO~eeop~tio~s,Stafrineach CSR maybe too ' ,
<br />large. .Thi~conunentappeaiS~ha~'som(lv.ndity; 'and ne~8;tObeaddres~d through' a" .
<br />" collaborative prqcessWithin,the lRM~inritunity.' staffing levels may ,be adjuSted depending on
<br />the out,c<mio,of.thiscpl!abOfat!O!l., .. ,'. ',' ,.', , " " "
<br />, ," '< " " " :. '~'; ;.\,:'.', " '" I, ,:' '
<br />" .- ,~, ",~'"":",:'.,,,,<'.".';":,,: ':".,<'\,".,:'""'",...",, ,~".'" .~,,' ',',,", ":, , .
<br />The proposed ~W111Bo" <:a\I~for:a proposed70nO split'l)etWeentheFederal workforce and
<br />Cflntractor ~u'ppott In:~~tic>it'lofthe competitive IRMjob market. and the need to ,assure'
<br />that :Westem:basthllriShtb~oe be~een:workforceco,n~l,I\lity aitdup-to-date skills,this
<br />balance has been chanBedtO a 50150 spilt for aIllRM officesWestllinwide. Ifnecessary"
<br />adjustments to tJlis'split may~,e made by lRM ~gers based upon such factors as local job
<br />market conditions. . ..' ,',," '.,., '", ",' , , , ',' "
<br />. '" ""', I,."" ' , ,
<br />
<br />, I FillaI staffinglIWel;12 FTE, 12 Contractor
<br />, , '
<br />
<br />\" .. ~, ..' ;
<br />lRMCSOSupporf," ,,' ",','
<br />, The IRM CSO Support gTOUpsupports tlWcomputer and information Iriana~ementn~ of
<br />I people who wo~iit theCSO. ' , ~ '
<br />
<br />" ,
<br />
<br />, ' ," ,; "", ,""" ",' " , ,I
<br />Several comments suggested that the ~fimCt,onshould becentra1ized, and that a C6rporate
<br />'Infonnation Office, be established that reports directly to the Admini$traior, in recognition of its
<br />.importan~.lt wa,s fiJrthefs~ggested that the CSO'aiIdeorporate appUcations groups could be
<br />combined' and report to t1ie.smte IRM manager. "',' , ,
<br />
<br />In' consid~ring this 'comment/seIliClrmanagers determined ,they need more focus on Western's
<br />coqiorate IRM stratllgy in the future, Rather than establishing another direcireport to the
<br />Administrator, the senior man~sers recOgnize that they neee! t~be involved in andprovidc future
<br />direction forWestem'sIRM functions, The ,final "WIlIBe" doe,S not centralize IRM,relying ,
<br />instead on ihemodcl of (jecentTalization imd collaboration to meet the needs oflRM customers.
<br />The eso and corporate applications groups will not be merged, to assurll focus 01'1 their
<br />, respective responsibilities and to avoid the risk of CSO support becoming a secondal)' priority,
<br />
<br />Final staffing level: 9,5 prE, 9,5 contraCtor
<br />
|