Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, ~, <br />j <br /> <br />~., <br />en <br />N <br />C)1 <br /> <br />It was estimated that irrigation efficiencies could be improved by improved <br />water 'management, that is, applying the necessary amount of water tosati sfy <br />crop qonsumptive use and the leaching requirement. A further increas.e in <br />irrigl!tion efficiency could be attained by improvement of the onfarmirriga- <br />tion ~ystems. Four program levels were developed to evaluate the cost of <br />onfam improvements and thei r effect on reducing return flows. <br /> <br />The p~ogram levels considered and their irrigation efficiency and estimated <br />return flow associated with each are presented in the following tabulation. <br /> <br /> <br />,<: <br />" <br /> <br />:j <br /> <br />,. <br />, <br /> <br />1- <br /> <br />PROGRAM LEVELS II <br /> <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br /> <br />Efficiency <br />( Percent) <br /> <br />64 <br />69 <br />72 <br />82 <br /> <br />Return Flow <br />(1.000 AF per year) <br /> <br />167 <br />147 <br />136 <br />94 <br /> <br />j: <br />;j <br /> <br />Level <br /> <br />'.1 <br /> <br />It was concluded that the highest level capable of achievement prior to the <br />desal~ing plant startup is a desirable goal. This is identified as ~rogram <br />Level ,3. The calculated return flow for Program Level 3 of 136,000 acre~feet <br />per year is a reasonable objective. Irrigation efficiencies of 64 percent <br />on th~ mesa lands and 74 percent on the valley lands are projected. The <br />average District-wiqe irrigation efficiency is 72 percent. <br /> <br />If measures under Program Level 3 are fully implemented and if the effective- <br />ness of these improvements increase irrigation efficiencies as projected in <br />these 'studi es, rlltut'n flows shoul d eventua 11y reduce to 136,000 acre-'feet <br />per year. However, there are uncertainties in reaching this objective. <br />They are (1) imprecision in the calculations of return flow quantities, <br />(2) r~set'vations that not all projected onfarm improvements will be fully <br />implemented prior to the plant startup date or that the measures will be <br />as effective in increasing irrigation efficiencies as estimated, and <br />(3) ctianges in cropping patterns. The Advisory Committee is highly confi- <br />dent ~hat return flows due to drainage requirements will be reduced to <br />l75,0~0 acre-feet per year and considers it reasonable to expect that return <br />flows iwill be reduced to 150,000 acre-feet per year. <br /> <br />In la~er work for the 1977 Sizing Study by the Bureau of Reclamation. <br />Program Levell and Program Level 3 irrigation efficiencies were reevaluated. <br />The ortiginal Program Levels 1 and 3 irrigation efficiencies were deri~ed <br />from 1:970-1972 crop data and efficiencies based on 11 percent canal loss. <br />Later~ changes were made for the 1970-1972 historic data to identify more <br />crops. use better estimates of consumptive use values, and reflect effi- <br />cienciles based on 8 percent canal loss. More recent and reliable data <br />obtairiedfrom ,theWMI&DD indicate that canal losses are closer to 8 percent. <br /> <br />'1 <br />'; <br /> <br />'{, <br /> <br />, <br />;;; <br />,- <br />_..J <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />:~ <br /> <br />'< <br /> <br />, <br />-'1' "-, <br /> <br />'";~ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. <br />,t <br />,'-\ <br /> <br />'.1; <br /> <br />,:;~ <br />'>' <br />'J <br />:; <br /> <br />Z! Based on 75,000 acres within the District. <br />24 <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />,:;;.' -~ - ".~ ,'"-"', <br /> <br />:.\.; ,;1 <br /> <br />c.,J;,.!,.,~,'U <br /> <br />..........., <br />