Laserfiche WebLink
<br />W <br />0") <br />o <br />o <br /> <br />"' <br /> <br />2, High Quality Substitute Water <br /> <br />,": ~ <br /> <br />Five cases were considered whereby higher quality waters were sub- <br />stituted for We11ton-Mohawk return flows. In all schemes, Colorado River <br />waters were the substitute supply, either directly or as available, due <br />to water saving measures, including canal lining and exchange agreements, <br />In most of these cases, the permanence of the solution became question- <br />able as projections of future development were made and compared with <br />allocati ons, <br /> <br />3. Changes in Operation of the We11ton-Mohawk District <br /> <br />These two cases considered partial and complete shutdown of the" <br />We1lton-Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage District. This would remove the <br />impact of the drainage flows on the river salinity, but had serious <br />finanCial, environmental, and human impacts. Appendix A deals with total <br />shutdown of the District in more detail, <br /> <br />4. Other Measures <br /> <br />Other cases considered included water quality controls above Imperial <br />Dam, mor~ efficient irrigation practices (see Section III), flow augmen- <br />tation, and even limiting future development in the Colorado River Basin. <br />As may be seen in the final plan description, some of these were included, <br />Howev~r, for the most part, legal and institutional problems posed serious <br />doubt as to the practicality or permanence of many of these schemes, <br /> <br />C. Recommended So 1 ut i on <br /> <br />It was recommended that a negotiated rather than an adjudicated solution <br />be sought to the salinity problem with Mexico. The differences among <br />legal land technical experts are so deep on a variety of questions relating <br />to the problem that resorting to adjudication would delay a solution for <br />a prolonged period. <br /> <br />It was concluded from the results of the systematic and detailed study <br />which 'the Task Force gave to the salinity problem that a permanent solution <br />to the problem could not be achieved immediately or without significant <br />costs in water or money or both. In a potentially overallocated basin, <br />solutions requiring significant expenditures of water were considered less <br />favorable and the Basin states advised that they would not accept any <br />solution involving permanent loss of Colorado River Basin water resources. <br />It was, and is, recognized that permanent bypass of We11ton-Mohawk (and <br />some other) returns, made up by substitution of additional mainstream <br />waters, would allow resolution of the salinity problem. 3/ However, this <br />substitution would take slightly over 200,000 acre-feet per year from <br />extant supplies. The task force concluded that resolution of the Mexican <br />salini;ty problem was a national obligation, to be borne by the nation as <br />a whole rather than by any specific segment. Therefore, the solution <br />should involve the expenditure of funds rather than water, limiting the <br /> <br />1/ Exhibit 2. <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />- ~ -.'-: <br /> <br />,~~ - f..-di{"' ,; <br /> <br />-~ <br />i <br />,';' ;}i <br />....'.... <br />"-,-,-,' <br />, ., <br />;0 <br />