Laserfiche WebLink
<br />35S7 <br /> <br />48 <br /> <br />RUEDI DAM AND RESERVOIR, COLO. <br /> <br />estimated in this report: Faeto~ that eould affect tl~e "\Va.ter requ~re- <br />mellts include elw.nges m p)ans~ lrrlgnble acreages, diversIOn reqUIre- <br />ments flnd amounts and patterns of OC'3urrence of return flow. <br />Alt.llOu"h the requirements for irrigation water may be subject to <br />substant.i~l modifieations, it appears tllat it can be reasonably eon- <br />eluded at this time that Ruedi Reservoir could provide an adequate <br />water supply for the lnnds eonsidered for irrigation developlll~nt, <br />and such use would constItute a pOSSIble alternate to that of supplym,g <br />munieipal and industrial needs. Therefore, eareful study of t.ills <br />alternate is warranted to establish its desirability based on factors of <br />economy, time of need, and availability of water sources for the <br />eompetitive uses. <br /> <br />Future investigations <br />Any future investigations by the Bureau of Reclamation of irriga- <br />tion service from Ruedi Reservoir to the lands discussed herein should <br />be of a seope adequate to firmly establish feasibility of development. <br />Detailed land classification surv"ys should be made to supplement <br />the available recunlll.lissanc.e information and more accurately deter- <br />mine the quality and extent of the lands and their suitability for <br />irrigation development.. Additional streamflow records find climato. <br />logical data shollld be obtained to evaluate water supplies, water <br />requirements. and capacities required for water conveyance and dis~ <br />tribution facilities, Plan formulntion studies would be required to <br />properly determine lands whieh eould be cconomically served in <br />COnillTIctioll with const.ruction features necessary for such service. <br />Field sU!'\'eys, geologieal explorations, and detailed designs and eon- <br />struction cost estimates WOlllrl be required for an features. Est.imates <br />should also be made of the costs of operating- and maintaining the <br />requir~d irrigatiOl~ features. Existin~ and antIcipated future farming <br />operatIOns, erop YIelds, expenses, ,and markets should be analyzed to <br />determine the payment abIlity of the water users and to derive esti- <br />mates of benefits for eomparison with costs of development. Com- <br />parable stlldies should also be made of companion and alternative <br />ll!=ies of irrignble lands and 'l\"ater from Ruedi Reservoir to determine <br />the proper and most economjcaJ course of development. <br /> <br />POWER ALTERN..I.\TIVE <br /> <br />Preliminary consideration has been given to hydroelectric power <br />deyeloprnent at Ruedi Dam. Po'\\er g(~ncration, however, would be <br />(Jf limited amount e\"en though all reservoir )'elem:es were patterned <br />to attain maximum output. Available hend would runO'e from a <br />minimum of 136 feet to a maximum of 263 feet. Under most fnyorable <br />cirCuIllsta.nces, average annual generat.ion would amowlt to alxmt 19 <br />million kilowatt-hours with an installed plant eapacit.y of about 4,300 <br />kilowatts. <br />In 'lilY case the nse of watcr for power 'Wo\Jld be subordinate to a <br />higher beneficial use such 3S municipal and industrial water or irriga- <br />tion in any ultimate operating plan that future det.ailed investigations <br />indicate. Also, it is apparent that afterbay regulation would be <br />essential for the generat.mn of an optimum degree of firm power. <br />. These studies indicate that, the feasibilit.y of power would be mar- <br />gmu] even under the most favorable circumstances. <br />